Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39394040›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental science & technology2024

Predictive Understanding of Stream Salinization in a Developed Watershed Using Machine Learning.

Jared D Smith, Lauren E Koenig, Margaux J Sleckman, Alison P Appling, Jeffrey M Sadler, Vincent T DePaul, Zoltan Szabo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental science & technology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jared D SmithWater Mission Area, Integrated Modeling and Prediction Division, U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia 20192, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-3124-8255
Lauren E KoenigWater Mission Area, Integrated Modeling and Prediction Division, U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia 20192, United States.
Margaux J SleckmanWater Mission Area, Integrated Information Dissemination Division, U.S. Geological Survey, San Francisco, California 94122, United States.
Alison P ApplingWater Mission Area, Integrated Modeling and Prediction Division, U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia 20192, United States.
Jeffrey M SadlerWater Mission Area, Integrated Information Dissemination Division, U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia 20192, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-8776-4844
Vincent T DePaulNew Jersey Water Science Center, U.S. Geological Survey, Lawrenceville, New Jersey 08648, United States.
Zoltan SzaboNew Jersey Water Science Center, U.S. Geological Survey, Lawrenceville, New Jersey 08648, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-0760-9607

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Stream salinization is a global issue, yet few models can provide reliable salinity estimates for unmonitored locations at the time scales required for ecological exposure assessments. Machine learning approaches are presented that use spatially limited high-frequency monitoring and spatially distributed discrete samples to estimate the daily stream-specific conductance across a watershed. We compare the predictive performance of space- and time-unaware Random Forest models and space- and time-aware Recurrent Graph Convolution Neural Network models (KGE: 0.67 and 0.64, respectively) and use explainable artificial intelligence methods to interpret model predictions and understand salinization drivers. These models are applied to the Delaware River Basin, a developed watershed with diverse land uses that experiences anthropogenic salinization from winter deicer applications. These models capture seasonality for the winter first flush of deicers, and the streams with elevated predictions correspond well with indicators of deicer application. This result suggests that these models can be used to identify potential salinity-impaired streams for winter best management practices. Daily salinity predictions are driven primarily by land cover (urbanization) trends that may represent anthropogenic salinization processes and weather at time scales up to three months. Such modeling approaches are likely transferable to other watersheds and can be applied to further understand salinization risks and drivers.

Indexed as

Machine LearningRiversSalinityEnvironmental MonitoringNeural Networks, ComputerSeasonsdeicersDelaware River Basinexplainable artificial intelligence (XAI)freshwater salinizationmachine learningseasonalityurbanwatershed

Identifiers

PMID39394040
PMCPMC11500705

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.