Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39393982›Full record

Trial reportNeurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics2024

Multisession tDCS combined with intrastimulation training improves emotion recognition in adolescents with autism spectrum disorder.

Karin Prillinger, Gabriel Amador de Lara, Manfred Klöbl, Rupert Lanzenberger, Paul L Plener, Luise Poustka, Lilian Konicar, Stefan T Radev

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Novel therapeutics in autism spectrum disorder.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2026
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Karin PrillingerDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria; Comprehensive Center for Pediatrics (CCP), Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria; Comprehensive Center for Clinical Neuroscience and Mental Health (C3NMH), Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria. Electronic address: karin.prillinger@meduniwien.ac.at.
Gabriel Amador de LaraDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria; Comprehensive Center for Pediatrics (CCP), Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria; Comprehensive Center for Clinical Neuroscience and Mental Health (C3NMH), Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria.
Manfred KlöblComprehensive Center for Clinical Neuroscience and Mental Health (C3NMH), Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria.
Rupert LanzenbergerComprehensive Center for Clinical Neuroscience and Mental Health (C3NMH), Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria.
Paul L PlenerDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria; Comprehensive Center for Pediatrics (CCP), Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria; Comprehensive Center for Clinical Neuroscience and Mental Health (C3NMH), Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria; Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Ulm, 89073 Ulm, Germany.
Luise PoustkaDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, University Hospital Heidelberg, 69115 Heidelberg, Germany.
Lilian KonicarDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria; Comprehensive Center for Pediatrics (CCP), Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria; Comprehensive Center for Clinical Neuroscience and Mental Health (C3NMH), Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria.
Stefan T RadevCognitive Science Department, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, 12180 Troy, New York, USA; Center for Modeling, Simulation and Imaging in Medicine (CEMSIM), Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, 12180 Troy, New York, USA.

Funding

Austrian Science Fund FWF KLI 600
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Previous studies indicate that transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a promising emerging treatment option for autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and its efficacy could be augmented using concurrent training. However, no intrastimulation social cognition training for ASD has been developed so far. The objective of this two-armed, double-blind, randomized, sham-controlled clinical trial is to investigate the effects of tDCS combined with a newly developed intrastimulation social cognition training on adolescents with ASD. Twenty-two male adolescents with ASD were randomly assigned to receive 10 sessions of either anodal or sham tDCS at F3/right supraorbital region together with online intrastimulation training comprising basic and complex emotion recognition tasks. Using baseline magnetic resonance imaging data, individual electric field distributions were simulated, and brain activation patterns of the training tasks were analyzed. Additionally, questionnaires were administered at baseline and following the intervention. Compared to sham tDCS, anodal tDCS significantly improved dynamic emotion recognition over the course of the sessions. This task also showed the highest activations in face processing regions. Moreover, the improvement was associated with electric field density at the medial prefrontal cortex and social awareness in exploratory analyses. Both groups showed high tolerability and acceptability of tDCS, and significant improvement in overall ASD symptoms. Taken together, multisession tDCS improved dynamic emotion recognition in adolescents with ASD using a task that activates brain regions associated with the social brain network. The variability in the electric field might diminish tDCS effects and future studies should investigate individualized approaches.

Indexed as

Autism Spectrum DisorderEmotionsTranscranial Direct Current StimulationAdolescentChildDouble-Blind MethodHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleRecognition, PsychologySocial CognitionAutism spectrum disorderElectric field simulationIntrastimulation trainingSocial cognitionTask activation patternsTranscranial direct current stimulation

Identifiers

PMID39393982
PMCPMC11585900

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.