ArticleRedox biology2024
A quantitative proteomic approach to evaluate the efficacy of carnosine in a murine model of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).
Article in Redox biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Skeletal muscle dysfunction in COPD: miRNAs, myokines and exercise.ERJ open research · 2026Review
- The Carnosine-HNE Michael Adduct as a Redox-Active Species Associated with Nrf2-Dependent Antioxidant and Anti-Inflammatory Responses.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Mechanistic insights and nanomedicine innovations of oligomeric proanthocyanidin in precision oncology: Ablating self-renewal capacity of metastatic cancer stem cells via multi-pathway modulation.Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2025Review
- Carnosine as a protective metabolic mediator in inflammatory lung injury by inhibiting macrophage infiltration and M1-like polarization.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Article
- Preclinical evidence and therapeutic perspectives on carnosine for the treatment of neurodegenerative disorders.AIMS neuroscience · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of the work was to study a dose-dependent effect of inhaled carnosine (10, 50 or 100 mg/kg/day) in mice exposed to cigarette smoke as a model of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). A dose-dependent loading of the dipeptide in lung tissue and bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) was firstly demonstrated by LC-ESI-MS analysis. Cigarette smoke exposure induced a significant lung inflammation and oxidative stress in mice which was dose-dependently reduced by carnosine. Inflammation was firstly evaluated by measuring the cytokines content in the BAL. All the measured cytokines were found significantly higher in the smoke group in respect to control, although the data are affected by a significant variability. Carnosine was found effective only at the highest dose tested and significantly only for keratinocyte-derived cytokine (KC). Due to the high variability of cytokines, a quantitative proteomic approach to better understand the functional effect of carnosine and its molecular mechanisms was used. Proteomic data clearly indicate that smoke exposure had a great impact on lung tissue with 692 proteins differentially expressed above a threshold of 1.5-fold. Protein network analysis identified the activation of some pathways characteristic of COPD, including inflammatory response, fibrosis, induction of immune system by infiltration and migration of leukocyte pathways, altered pathway of calcium metabolism and oxidative stress. Carnosine at the tested dose of 100 mg/kg was found effective in reverting all the pathways evoked by smoke. Only a partial reverse of the dysregulated proteins was evident at low- and mid-tested doses, although, for some specific proteins, indicating an overall dose-dependent effect. Regarding the molecular mechanisms involved, we found that carnosine upregulated some key enzymes related to Nrf2 activation and in particular glutathione peroxidase, reductase, transferase, SOD, thioredoxins, and carbonyl reductase. Such mechanism would explain the antioxidant and anti-inflammatory effects of the dipeptide.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.