Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39393280›Full record

ArticleUltrasonics sonochemistry2024

Mass and heat transfer in audible sound driven bubbles.

Davide Masiello, Ignacio Tudela, Stephen J Shaw, Ben Jacobson, Paul Prentice, Prashant Valluri, Rama Govindarajan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ultrasonics sonochemistry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Davide MasielloSchool of Engineering, The University of Edinburgh, Sanderson building, Robert Stevenson Road, Edinburgh EH9 3FB, United Kingdom.
Ignacio TudelaSchool of Engineering, The University of Edinburgh, Sanderson building, Robert Stevenson Road, Edinburgh EH9 3FB, United Kingdom. Electronic address: ignacio.tudela@ed.ac.uk.
Stephen J ShawDepartment of Applied Mathematics, Xi'an Jiaotong-Liverpool University, Suzhou, 695014, China. Electronic address: stephen.shaw@xjtlu.edu.cn.
Ben JacobsonCentre for Medical Industrial Ultrasonics (C-MIU), James Watt School of Engineering, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ, United Kingdom.
Paul PrenticeCentre for Medical Industrial Ultrasonics (C-MIU), James Watt School of Engineering, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ, United Kingdom.
Prashant ValluriSchool of Engineering, The University of Edinburgh, Sanderson building, Robert Stevenson Road, Edinburgh EH9 3FB, United Kingdom.
Rama GovindarajanInternational Centre for Theoretical Sciences, Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Bengaluru 560089, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Most research on sonoluminescence and sonochemistry has been conducted at acoustic frequencies above ∼20 kHz. Consequently, mathematical models for the dynamics of acoustically-driven bubbles have hardly been examined in the audible frequency spectrum. Here, we develop a new hybrid modelling approach that combines the rigour of the advection-diffusion model whilst retaining the simplicity of a reduced-order boundary layer model to predict phase-change, mass and heat transfer in an inertially collapsing bubble excited by audible sound. Differences in these approaches are explored through a thorough validation against experimental data obtained from ultra-high speed videos of bubble dynamics at 17.8 kHz. Our results indicate that, while the boundary layer model agrees well with the advection-diffusion model at high driving frequencies, there are significant deviations at lower frequencies, where the boundary layer model overpredicts parameters such as bubble size and quantity of trapped vapour while underpredicting others such as temperature and pressure. These deviations at lower frequencies is caused by an inaccurate estimation of the boundary layer thickness originating from the time-scale competition between diffusion and fast bubble wall motion. Our work questions the suitability of existing reduced-order models developed for ultrasonic frequencies when applied to the audible range, reinforcing that further research in the audible range is needed.

Indexed as

Acoustic cavitationAdvection–diffusionAudible soundBoundary layerSingle bubble dynamics

Identifiers

PMID39393280
PMCPMC11732760

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.