ArticleUltrasonics sonochemistry2024
Mass and heat transfer in audible sound driven bubbles.
Article in Ultrasonics sonochemistry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Nonlinear modal evolution of microbubbles confined by rigid capillary constraint.Ultrasonics sonochemistry · 2026Article
- Hysteresis in cavitation emissions during a ramped-then-deramped amplitude sonication: A theoretical and experimental investigation.Nonlinear dynamics · 2026Article
- Fundamentals of acoustic and hydrodynamic cavitation.Ultrasonics sonochemistry · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Most research on sonoluminescence and sonochemistry has been conducted at acoustic frequencies above ∼20 kHz. Consequently, mathematical models for the dynamics of acoustically-driven bubbles have hardly been examined in the audible frequency spectrum. Here, we develop a new hybrid modelling approach that combines the rigour of the advection-diffusion model whilst retaining the simplicity of a reduced-order boundary layer model to predict phase-change, mass and heat transfer in an inertially collapsing bubble excited by audible sound. Differences in these approaches are explored through a thorough validation against experimental data obtained from ultra-high speed videos of bubble dynamics at 17.8 kHz. Our results indicate that, while the boundary layer model agrees well with the advection-diffusion model at high driving frequencies, there are significant deviations at lower frequencies, where the boundary layer model overpredicts parameters such as bubble size and quantity of trapped vapour while underpredicting others such as temperature and pressure. These deviations at lower frequencies is caused by an inaccurate estimation of the boundary layer thickness originating from the time-scale competition between diffusion and fast bubble wall motion. Our work questions the suitability of existing reduced-order models developed for ultrasonic frequencies when applied to the audible range, reinforcing that further research in the audible range is needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.