ReviewTissue & cell2024
Decellularization of various tissues and organs through chemical methods.
Review in Tissue & cell, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Recent Trends in Tissue Engineering Strategies for Uterine Endometrial Regeneration: a Systematic Review.Reproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.) · 2026Pooled it
- dECM bioinks for 3D bioprinted tumor models: Advances, challenges, and drug screening.iScience · 2026Review
- Fabrication of a Bioactive Human Adipose Extracellular Matrix Allograft Using Supercritical Carbon Dioxide.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2026Article
- Rapid and Efficient Combined Decellularization with Physical, Chemical and Enzymatic Treatment for Production of Bovine-Derived Meniscal Implant to Replace Damaged Meniscus.Tissue engineering and regenerative medicine · 2026Article
- Sacrificial Biofabrication for Vascularization: Concept, Materials, Technologies, and Applications.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Due to the increase in demand for donor organs and tissues during the past 20 years, new approaches have been created. These methods include, for example, tissue engineering in vitro and the production of regenerative biomaterials for transplantation. Applying the natural extracellular matrix (ECM) as a bioactive biomaterial for clinical applications is a unique approach known as decellularization technology. Decellularization is the process of eliminating cells from an extracellular matrix while preserving its natural components including its structural and functional proteins and glycosaminoglycan. This can be achieved by physical, chemical, or biological processes. A naturally formed three-dimensional structure with a biocompatible and regenerative structure is the result of the decellularization process. Decreasing the biological factors and antigens at the transplant site reduces the risk of adverse effects including inflammatory responses and immunological rejection. Regenerative medicine and tissue engineering applications can benefit from the use of decellularization, a promising approach that provides a biomaterial that preserves its extracellular matrix.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.