Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39393048›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of physiology2025

Bioavailable testosterone and androgen receptor activation, but not total testosterone, are associated with muscle mass and strength in females.

Sarah E Alexander, Briana Gatto, Olivia E Knowles, Ross M Williams, Kinga N Fiebig, Paul Jansons, Paul A Della Gatta, Andrew Garnham, Nir Eynon, Glenn D Wadley and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of physiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Sex hormones and menopause hormone therapy predict muscle strength across the lifespan.Journal of applied physiology (Bethesda, Md. : 1985) · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Science advances · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Sarah E AlexanderInstitute for Physical Activity and Nutrition, School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-2612-7769
Briana GattoInstitute for Physical Activity and Nutrition, School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia.
Olivia E KnowlesInstitute for Physical Activity and Nutrition, School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-5579-1247
Ross M WilliamsInstitute for Physical Activity and Nutrition, School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-3987-8318
Kinga N FiebigInstitute for Physical Activity and Nutrition, School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia.
Paul JansonsInstitute for Physical Activity and Nutrition, School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-8766-0516
Paul A Della GattaInstitute for Physical Activity and Nutrition, School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2231-8370
Andrew GarnhamInstitute for Physical Activity and Nutrition, School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8068-9300
Nir EynonAustralian Regenerative Medicine Institute (ARMI), Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4046-8276
Glenn D WadleyInstitute for Physical Activity and Nutrition, School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6617-4359
Brad AisbettInstitute for Physical Activity and Nutrition, School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8077-0272
Danielle HiamInstitute for Physical Activity and Nutrition, School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-0135-329X
Séverine LamonInstitute for Physical Activity and Nutrition, School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-3271-6551

Funding

Australian Research Council Future Fellowship FT10100278International Olympic Committee Mrdical and Scientific Research Fund N/A
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Testosterone, the major androgen, influences the reproductive and non-reproductive systems in males and females via binding to the androgen receptor (AR). Both circulating endogenous testosterone and muscle AR protein content are positively associated with muscle mass and strength in males, but there is no such evidence in females. Here, we tested whether circulating testosterone levels were associated with muscle mass, function, or the muscle anabolic response to resistance training in pre-menopausal females. Twenty-seven pre-menopausal, untrained females (aged 23.5 ± 4.8 years) underwent a 12-week resistance training programme. Muscle strength, size, power, and plasma and urine androgen hormone levels were measured. Skeletal muscle biopsies were collected before and after the training programme to quantify the effect of resistance training on AR content and nuclear localisation. Primary muscle cell lines were cultured from a subset (n = 6) of the participants' biopsies and treated with testosterone to investigate its effect on myotube diameter, markers of muscle protein synthesis and AR cellular localisation. Physiological levels of total testosterone were not associated with muscle mass or strength at baseline or with the changes in muscle mass and strength that occurred in response to resistance training in our cohort of pre-menopausal females. In contrast, bioavailable testosterone and the proportion of nuclear-localised AR were positively associated with skeletal muscle mass and strength in pre-menopausal females. In vitro, supra-physiological doses of testosterone increased myocyte diameter, but this did not occur via the Akt/mTOR pathway as previously suggested. Instead, we show a marked increase in AR nuclear localisation with testosterone administration in vitro. KEY POINTS: Total circulating testosterone was not related to muscle mass or strength before or after resistance training in pre-menopausal females. Bioavailable testosterone was positively related to exercise-induced muscle hypertrophy in pre-menopausal females. In vivo nuclear localisation of the androgen receptor was positively related to muscle mass in pre-menopausal females at baseline, but not to resistance training-induced hypertrophy. Testosterone treatment induced androgen receptor nuclear translocation but did not induce mTOR signalling in primary skeletal myocytes cultured from pre-menopausal female muscle.

Indexed as

Muscle, SkeletalMuscle StrengthReceptors, AndrogenTestosteroneAdultFemaleHumansPremenopauseResistance TrainingYoung AdultAR protein, humanReceptors, AndrogenTestosteroneandrogensexercisefemalemusclesex hormoneswomen

Identifiers

PMID39393048
PMCPMC12456396

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.