Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39392832›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Comparative study of machine learning approaches integrated with genetic algorithm for IVF success prediction.

Shirin Dehghan, Reza Rabiei, Hamid Choobineh, Keivan Maghooli, Mozhdeh Nazari, Mojtaba Vahidi-Asl

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Shirin DehghanDepartment of Health Information Technology and Management, School of Allied Medical Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Reza RabieiDepartment of Health Information Technology and Management, School of Allied Medical Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.ORCID 0000-0003-0771-7306
Hamid ChoobinehDepartment of Laboratory Sciences, School of Allied Medical Sciences, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Keivan MaghooliDepartment of Biomedical Engineering Science and Research Branch Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
Mozhdeh NazariDepartment of Health Information Technology and Management, School of Allied Medical Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Mojtaba Vahidi-AslFaculty of Computer Science and Engineering, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionIVF is a widely-used assisted reproductive technology with a consistent success rate of around 30%, and improving this rate is crucial due to emotional, financial, and health-related implications for infertile couples. This study aimed to develop a model for predicting IVF outcome by comparing five machine-learning techniques.

methodThe research approached five prominent machine learning algorithms, including Random Forest, Artificial Neural Network (ANN), Support Vector Machine (SVM), Recursive Partitioning and Regression Trees (RPART), and AdaBoost, in the context of IVF success prediction. The study also incorporated GA as a feature selection method to enhance the predictive models' robustness.

resultsFindings demonstrate that AdaBoost, particularly when combined with GA feature selection, achieved the highest accuracy rate of 89.8%. Using GA, Random Forest also demonstrated strong performance, achieving an accuracy rate of 87.4%. Genetic Algorithm significantly improved the performance of all classifiers, emphasizing the importance of feature selection. Ten crucial features, including female age, AMH, endometrial thickness, sperm count, and various indicators of oocyte and embryo quality, were identified as key determinants of IVF success.

conclusionThese findings underscore the potential of machine learning and feature selection techniques to assist IVF clinicians in providing more accurate predictions, enabling tailored treatment plans for each patient. Future research and validation can further enhance the practicality and reliability of these predictive models in clinical IVF practice.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsFertilization in VitroMachine LearningAdultFemaleHumansMaleNeural Networks, ComputerPregnancySupport Vector Machine

Identifiers

PMID39392832
PMCPMC11469510

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.