Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39392824›Full record

ArticlePLOS global public health2024

Explanatory models in real-world clinical interactions at a pediatric cancer center in Guatemala.

Laura C Harrison, Silvia Rivas, Lucia Fuentes, Ana Cáceres-Serrano, Gia Ferrara, Federico Antillon-Klussmann, Carlos Rodriguez-Galindo, Jennifer W Mack, Dylan E Graetz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS global public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Laura C HarrisonDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, Tennessee, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-8628-9551
Silvia RivasDepartment of Palliative Care, Unidad Nacional de Oncología Pediátrica, Guatemala City, Guatemala.
Lucia FuentesDepartment of Psychology, Unidad Nacional de Oncología Pediátrica, Guatemala City, Guatemala.
Ana Cáceres-SerranoDepartment of Psychology, Unidad Nacional de Oncología Pediátrica, Guatemala City, Guatemala.
Gia FerraraDepartment of Global Pediatric Medicine, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee, United States of America.
Federico Antillon-KlussmannDepartment of Oncology, Unidad Nacional de Oncología Pediátrica, Guatemala City, Guatemala.
Carlos Rodriguez-GalindoDepartment of Global Pediatric Medicine, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2360-8946
Jennifer W MackDepartments of Pediatric Oncology and Population Sciences, Dana Farber Cancer Institute/Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Dylan E GraetzDepartment of Global Pediatric Medicine, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4541-6910

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Explanatory models (EMs) are used in medical anthropology to characterize individual understandings of illness. This study investigated how interdisciplinary clinical interactions elicited caregiver EMs at a pediatric cancer center in Guatemala. This qualitative study included caregivers of 20 children with newly diagnosed cancer at Unidad Nacional de Oncología Pediátrica (UNOP) in Guatemala City, Guatemala. UNOP's diagnostic process includes social work intake, psychoeducation with a psychologist, and a diagnostic conversation with an oncologist and psychologist. Audio-recordings from the diagnostic process and a semi-structured interview were obtained, transcribed, and translated from Spanish. Transcripts were coded using a priori codes based on the five explanatory model (EM) components (occurrence, causation, pathophysiology, course of sickness, and treatment), as well as disease, and illness accounts. Thematic content analysis explored the EM framework as applied to diagnostic interactions between families and clinicians. All five components of the EM were addressed during the diagnostic process at UNOP. Clinicians, particularly psychologists, initiated conversation about the EM more than caregivers. When prompted, caregivers discussed all aspects of the EM but only rarely mentioned pathophysiology. Disease accounts were primarily described by clinicians, while caregivers used illness accounts to describe cancer causation. Clinicians validated existence of both disease and illness accounts. UNOP's interdisciplinary team elicited families' beliefs and facilitated in-depth discussion of all aspects of the EM, leading to a shared understanding of cancer and its treatment. Utilizing the EM framework in clinical practice may support culturally-competent pediatric cancer care.

Identifiers

PMID39392824
PMCPMC11469487

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.