Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39392822›Full record

ArticlePLOS global public health2024

Factors influencing the implementation of integrated screening for HIV, syphilis, and hepatitis B for pregnant women in Nepal: A qualitative study.

Lucie Sabin, Hassan Haghparast-Bidgoli, Bibhu Thapaliya, Obindra Chand, Sanju Bhattarai, Abriti Arjyal, Naomi Saville

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS global public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Lucie SabinInstitute for Global Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0957-2673
Hassan Haghparast-BidgoliInstitute for Global Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Bibhu ThapaliyaSwisscontact, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Obindra ChandSchool of Health and Social Care, University of Essex, Colchester, United Kingdom.
Sanju BhattaraiDepartment of Public Health and Nursing, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4246-9117
Abriti ArjyalHERD International, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Naomi SavilleInstitute for Global Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In Nepal, national guidelines recommend free HIV and syphilis screening for pregnant women at their first antenatal visit, using an opt-out approach. However, screening uptake is low and the guidelines do not include hepatitis B screening. It is essential to understand the factors influencing the implementation of integrated screening for HIV, syphilis, and hepatitis B, as recommended by WHO, to improve uptake and prevent vertical transmission. This study explored the knowledge, attitudes, and perceptions of pregnant women, their families, healthcare providers and policymakers on integrated prenatal screening. We conducted 12 in-depth interviews with pregnant women, 10 with their husbands and 4 with mothers-in-law in Kapilvastu and Kathmandu. In addition, we interviewed 7 health workers and 4 decision-makers. These interviews were sufficient to reach saturation. Data were analysed using a thematic content analysis. A combination of the social-ecological model and the WHO building blocks provided a theoretical framework for interpreting data. The analysis showed that antenatal screening in Nepal involved many stakeholders and was influenced by various factors. Implementation issues were found in the building blocks service delivery, health workforce and medical products. Husbands and in-laws play an important role in the acceptance of screening by pregnant women, especially in rural areas. High levels of stigma and discrimination against people with sexually transmitted diseases were reported, and knowledge of hepatitis B and syphilis was low. Access and uptake of screening could be improved through rapid testing, by strengthening the health system and by integrating hepatitis B screening through an opt-out approach like that for HIV and syphilis. Effective community involvement through awareness campaigns and investment in lower-level health facilities is essential to improve screening rates. This study provides information for decision-makers about challenges in implementing integrated screening to guide the design of targeted interventions to reduce vertical transmission.

Identifiers

PMID39392822
PMCPMC11469532

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.