ArticlePLOS global public health2024
Factors influencing the implementation of integrated screening for HIV, syphilis, and hepatitis B for pregnant women in Nepal: A qualitative study.
Article in PLOS global public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Viral hepatitis co-infections with tuberculosis in India: A systematic review and meta-analysis.The Indian journal of medical research · 2026Pooled it
- Factors influencing implementation of point-of-care tests for maternal and newborn screening and diagnosis in low-resource settings: a systematic review.BMC global and public health · 2026Pooled it
- Analysis of the spatio-temporal pattern and evolutionary trends of syphilis at township level in Xining City, Qinghai Province, China from 2008 to 2024.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Article
- Integration of HIV, Hepatitis B, and C, and sexually transmitted infections services: A scoping review of the benefits and challenges.PloS one · 2026Article
- Cost-effectiveness of integrated maternal HIV, syphilis, and hepatitis B screening opt-out strategies in Nepal: a modelling study.The Lancet regional health. Southeast Asia · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In Nepal, national guidelines recommend free HIV and syphilis screening for pregnant women at their first antenatal visit, using an opt-out approach. However, screening uptake is low and the guidelines do not include hepatitis B screening. It is essential to understand the factors influencing the implementation of integrated screening for HIV, syphilis, and hepatitis B, as recommended by WHO, to improve uptake and prevent vertical transmission. This study explored the knowledge, attitudes, and perceptions of pregnant women, their families, healthcare providers and policymakers on integrated prenatal screening. We conducted 12 in-depth interviews with pregnant women, 10 with their husbands and 4 with mothers-in-law in Kapilvastu and Kathmandu. In addition, we interviewed 7 health workers and 4 decision-makers. These interviews were sufficient to reach saturation. Data were analysed using a thematic content analysis. A combination of the social-ecological model and the WHO building blocks provided a theoretical framework for interpreting data. The analysis showed that antenatal screening in Nepal involved many stakeholders and was influenced by various factors. Implementation issues were found in the building blocks service delivery, health workforce and medical products. Husbands and in-laws play an important role in the acceptance of screening by pregnant women, especially in rural areas. High levels of stigma and discrimination against people with sexually transmitted diseases were reported, and knowledge of hepatitis B and syphilis was low. Access and uptake of screening could be improved through rapid testing, by strengthening the health system and by integrating hepatitis B screening through an opt-out approach like that for HIV and syphilis. Effective community involvement through awareness campaigns and investment in lower-level health facilities is essential to improve screening rates. This study provides information for decision-makers about challenges in implementing integrated screening to guide the design of targeted interventions to reduce vertical transmission.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.