Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39392547›Full record

SynthesisCurrent psychiatry reports2024

The Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance of Digital Mental Health Interventions for College Students: A Systematic Review.

Madison E Taylor, Michelle Liu, Sara Abelson, Daniel Eisenberg, Sarah K Lipson, Stephen M Schueller

Registry-linked trialAbstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Current psychiatry reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07242378 (Evaluating Knowledge Mobilization Sustainability Approaches for Stress Management in University Students), which is not on this map. Cited by 20 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07242378 nacompletednot on this map

Evaluating Knowledge Mobilization Sustainability Approaches for Stress Management in University Students

TypeinterventionalSponsorMcGill UniversityRan2023 to 2024Enrolled331ConditionsStress, Coping, Well-being, MindfulnessArmsSustainability of stress management strategy use, Stress management
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Madison E TaylorDepartment of Psychological Science, University of California, 214 Pereira Dr, Irvine, CA, 92617, USA. madisoet@uci.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9112-8314
Michelle LiuDepartment of Psychological Science, University of California, 214 Pereira Dr, Irvine, CA, 92617, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1373-7103
Sara AbelsonDepartment of Urban Health and Population Science, Lewis Katz School of Medicine, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4854-0164
Daniel EisenbergDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Fielding School of Public Health, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5597-7925
Sarah K LipsonDepartment of Health Law, Policy, and Management, School of Public Health, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4552-4361
Stephen M SchuellerDepartment of Psychological Science, University of California, 214 Pereira Dr, Irvine, CA, 92617, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1003-0399

Funding

Scientific and Technical CoreP2CHD041022 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI HIRAM BELTRAN-SANCHEZ · 2016 to 2026
$6.9M
NICHD NIH HHS P2C HD041022
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewWe evaluated the impact of digital mental health interventions (DMHIs) for college students. We organized findings using the RE-AIM framework to include reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation, and maintenance. RECENT

findingsWe conducted a systematic literature review of recent findings from 2019-2024. Our search identified 2,701 articles, of which 95 met inclusion criteria. In the reach domain, student samples were overwhelmingly female and White. In the effectiveness domain, over 80% of DMHIs were effective or partially effective at reducing their primary outcome. In the adoption domain, studies reported modest uptake for DMHIs. In the implementation and maintenance domains, studies reported high adherence rates to DMHI content. While recruitment methods were commonly reported, adaptations and costs of implementation and maintenance were rarely reported. DMHIs for college students are effective for many psychological outcomes. Future work should address diversifying samples and considering implementation in a variety of college settings.

Indexed as

Mental Health ServicesStudentsHumansTelemedicineUniversitiesCollege studentsDigital mental healthImplementation scienceMhealthSystematic reviewUniversities

Identifiers

PMID39392547
PMCPMC11706926

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.