ReviewAnalytical and bioanalytical chemistry2025
Eco-friendly solvents in liquid-liquid microextraction techniques for biological and environmental analysis: a critical review.
Review in Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Determination of Trace Platinum in Water Samples by Ionic Liquid-Dispersive Liquid-Liquid Microextraction Combined with Graphite Furnace Atomic Absorption Spectrometry.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Continuous sample drop flow microextraction: a versatile and green microextraction tool in analytical chemistry.RSC advances · 2026Review
- Article
- Solubilizing Nonpolar Substances in Polar Solvents: Strategies, Molecular Mechanisms, and Applications.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Assessing calibration methods for fenuron determination in carrot juice via GC-MS with salt-assisted switchable solvent microextraction.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Deep eutectic solvents for green extraction and separation of bioactive compounds from traditional Chinese medicines.Chinese medicine · 2026Review
- Article
- Hydrophilic deep eutectic solvents for bioactive compound extraction from Rubia tinctorum L.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In recent years, green solvents have emerged as promising alternatives in the field of analytical chemistry, replacing conventional organic solvents known for their toxicity, volatility, and flammability. The combination of these solvents with liquid-liquid microextraction techniques has facilitated the development of simpler, faster, more economical, and environment-friendly methodologies for the analysis of samples of varying complexity. This review discusses the fundamental physicochemical properties and advantages of using deep eutectic solvents, ionic liquids, switchable-hydrophilicity solvents, supramolecular solvents, and surfactants as extractants. Furthermore, analytical methods based on liquid-liquid microextraction techniques developed in the last 5 years for the determination of organic compounds and metals in biological and environmental samples are presented and discussed, highlighting their applications and benefits to improve analytical performance and sustainability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39392506What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.