ArticleInvestigative ophthalmology & visual science2024
Glial Cell Responses and Gene Expression Dynamics in Retinas of Treated and Untreated RPE65 Mutant Dogs.
Article in Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Crosstalk Between R-Loops, RNA/DNA Modifications, and Cell Death Dynamics in Canine Models of Retinitis Pigmentosa.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2026Article
- Impact of PEGylation and hyaluronan functionalization on lipoplex-mediated mRNA delivery to the canine retina.Drug delivery · 2025Article
- Minocycline treatment reduces the activation of mononuclear phagocytes and improves retinal function in a mouse model of Leber congenital amaurosis.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose: The long-term evaluation of RPE65 gene augmentation initiated in middle-aged RPE65 mutant dogs previously uncovered notable inter-animal and intra-retinal variations in treatment efficacy. The study aims to gain deeper insights into the status of mutant retinas and assess the treatment impact. Methods: Immunohistochemistry utilizing cell-specific markers and reverse transcription-quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) analysis were conducted on archival retinal sections from normal and RPE65 mutant dogs. Results: Untreated middle-aged mutant retinas exhibited marked downregulation in the majority of 20 examined genes associated with key retinal pathways. These changes were accompanied by a moderate increase in microglia numbers, altered expression patterns of glial-neuronal transmitter recycling proteins, and gliotic responses in Müller glia. Analysis of advanced-aged mutant dogs revealed mild outer nuclear layer loss in the treated eye compared to moderate loss in the corresponding retinal regions of the untreated control eye. However, persistent Müller glial stress response along with photoreceptor synapse loss were evident in both treated and untreated eyes. Photoreceptor synaptic remodeling, infrequent in treated regions, was observed in all untreated advanced-aged retinas, accompanied by a progressive increase in microglial cells indicative of ongoing inflammation. Interestingly, about half of the examined genes showed similar expression levels between treated and untreated advanced-aged mutant retinas, with some reaching normal levels. Conclusions: Gene expression data suggest a shift from pro-degenerative mechanisms in middle-aged mutant retinas to more compensatory mechanisms in preserved retinal regions at advanced stages, despite ongoing degeneration. Such shift, potentially attributed to a number of surviving resilient cells, may influence disease patterns and treatment outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.