ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2024
Artificial Intelligence-Enhanced OCT Biomarkers Analysis in Macula-off Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment Patients.
Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Patient-Reported Outcomes after Surgery for Proliferative Vitreoretinopathy: Post hoc Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial.Ophthalmologica. Journal international d'ophtalmologie. International journal of ophthalmology. Zeitschrift fur Augenheilkunde · 2026Trial
- Optical Coherence Tomography Biomarkers in Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment: A Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Prognostic Imaging Biomarkers in Diabetic Macular Edema Treated with Anti-VEGF: A Multicenter AI Perspective.Ophthalmology and therapy · 2026Article
- Serial Aqueous Humor Proteomics in Diabetic Macular Edema: Correlation of Novel Targets with Retinal Fluid Volume.Ophthalmology science · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Vitreoretinal Surgery: A Systematic Review of Current Applications and Future Directions.Ophthalmology and therapy · 2026Review
- Initial Experiences of Switching to Aflibercept 8 mg for Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration and Polypoidal Chorodal Vasculopathy in an Asian Population.Ophthalmology and therapy · 2026Article
- Global perspectives of ophthalmologists on artificial intelligence adoption in clinical practice.International journal of retina and vitreous · 2025Article
- Bias in predictive models for vitreoretinal diseases: ethnic and socioeconomic disparities in artificial intelligence.Eye (London, England) · 2025Article
- Artificial intelligence analysis of OCT biomarkers to predict visual outcomes following vitrectomy for epiretinal membrane.International journal of retina and vitreous · 2025Article
- Current Topics in OCT Applications in Vitreoretinal Surgery.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Optical Coherence Tomography in Retinal Detachment: Prognostic Biomarkers, Surgical Planning, and Postoperative Monitoring.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To identify optical coherence tomography (OCT) biomarkers for macula-off rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) with artificial intelligence (AI) and to correlate these biomarkers with functional outcomes. Methods: Patients with macula-off RRD treated with single vitrectomy and gas tamponade were included. OCT volumes, taken at 4 to 6 weeks and 1 year postoperative, were uploaded on an AI-derived platform (Discovery OCT Biomarker Detector; RetinAI AG, Bern, Switzerland), measuring different retinal layer thicknesses, including outer nuclear layer (ONL), photoreceptor and retinal pigmented epithelium (PR + RPE), intraretinal fluid (IRF), subretinal fluid, and biomarker probability detection, including hyperreflective foci (HF). A random forest model assessed the predictive factors for final best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA). Results: Fifty-nine patients (42 male, 17 female) were enrolled. Baseline BCVA was 0.5 logarithmic minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) ± 0.1, significantly improving to 0.3 ± 0.1 logMAR at the final visit (P < 0.001). Average thickness analysis indicated a significant increase after the last follow-up visit for ONL (from 95.16 ± 5.47 µm to 100.8 ± 5.27 µm, P = 0.0007) and PR + RPE thicknesses (60.9 ± 2.6 µm to 66.2 ± 1.8 µm, P = 0.0001). Average occurrence rate of HF was 0.12 ± 0.06 at initial visit and 0.08 ± 0.05 at last follow-up visit (P = 0.0093). Random forest model revealed baseline BCVA as the most critical predictor for final BCVA, followed by ONL thickness, HF, and IRF presence at the initial visit. Conclusions: Increased ONL and PR-RPE thickness associate with better outcomes, while HF presence indicates poorer results, with initial BCVA remaining a primary visual predictor. Translational Relevance: The study underscores the role of novel biomarkers like HF in understanding visual function in macula-off RRD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.