Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39392380›Full record

ArticlePsychophysiology2024

Assessing motivational biases in brain and behavior: Event-related potential and response time concomitants of the approach-avoidance task.

Christopher T Sege, James W Lopez, Natalie M Hellman, Lisa M McTeague

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychophysiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Christopher T SegeDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0040-0939
James W LopezDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0761-1560
Natalie M HellmanDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4811-2346
Lisa M McTeagueDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4475-9425

Funding

TREATING ETHANOL WITHDRAWAL WITH LORAZEPAM/NALTREXONEP50AA010761 · NIAAA · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI Patrick J. Mulholland · 1996 to 2026
$46.8M
Modeling and Modulating Mechanisms of Escape, Avoidance, and Approach in the Anxiety Disorder SpectrumK23MH123931 · NIMH · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI SEGE, CHRISTOPHER · 2021 to 2025
$1.0M
Medical University of South CarolinaNIAAA NIH HHS P50 AA010761NIMH NIH HHS K23 MH123931NIMH NIH HHS MH123931
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The approach-avoidance task (AAT) is designed to measure implicit motivated action biases instantiated by emotional stimuli and alterations in such biases that drive psychiatric disorder. While some research has measured AAT event-related potential (ERP) correlates to establish bias sensitivity even at a neural level, a lack of work with unpleasant, pleasant, and neutral stimuli together and a common focus on psychiatric disorder-matched (rather than generally emotional) content limits conclusions that can be drawn. Thus, current work extends the AAT literature by testing ERP modulations across normatively unpleasant, pleasant, and neutral conditions; and supporting the task's use as an individual difference assessment, it also provides data on AAT reliability and initially explores anxiety-related effects when stimuli are not disorder-matched. In 38 participants including 19 anxiety treatment-seeking individuals, 32 sensor electroencephalography revealed robust N100, N200, and late positive potential (LPP) ERP components and bias-consistent modulations for unpleasant images (reduced N200s on unpleasant push relative to pull trials; enhanced LPP for unpleasant compared to neutral trials). Meanwhile, modulations were less consistent with emotion-driven bias for other conditions-that is, LPPs were enhanced but N200 was not modulated for pleasant images, and for neutral images, N200 was unexpectedly enhanced on push compared to pull trials. Following these analyses, reliability tests revealed excellent raw ERP reliabilities but lower reliabilities for modulation scores, and comparing treatment- to non-treatment-seeking groups showed no preliminary indication of ERP modulation changes when stimuli are not personally relevant. How these findings together inform understanding of AAT as a measure of bias is discussed.

Indexed as

ElectroencephalographyEmotionsEvoked PotentialsMotivationReaction TimeAdolescentAdultAnxietyAvoidance LearningBrainFemaleHumansMaleYoung Adultanxietyapproach–avoidance taskemotionERPsmotivation

Identifiers

PMID39392380
PMCPMC11578779

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.