Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39392112›Full record

ReviewThe Journal of experimental biology2024

Making in vitro conditions more reflective of in vivo conditions for research on the teleost gastrointestinal tract.

Carol Bucking, Nic R Bury, Henrik Sundh, Chris M Wood

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Journal of experimental biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. A 30-year retrospective on the respirometric method for measuring instantaneous metabolic fuel use in fish.Journal of comparative physiology. B, Biochemical, systemic, and environmental physiology · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Carol BuckingDepartment of Biology, Farquharson Life Science Building, York University, Toronto, ON, M3J 1P3, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-3655-426X
Nic R BurySchool of Ocean and Earth Sciences, University of Southampton, National Oceanographic Centre, Waterfront Campus, Southampton, Hampshire, SO14 3ZH, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6048-6338
Henrik SundhDepartment of Biological & Environmental Sciences, University of Gothenburg, Medicinaregatan 7 B, 41390 Göteborg, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-1459-5450
Chris M WoodDepartment of Zoology, University of British Columbia, 6270 University Blvd, Vancouver, BC, V6T1Z4, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-9542-2219

Funding

Horizon Europe HORIZON-CL6-2023-ZEROPOLLUTION-01Natural Environment Research Council NE/X000192/1Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada RGPIN-2023-03714Svenska Forskningsrådet Formas 2018-01201University of Southampton
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To date, the majority of in vitro or ex vivo fish gastrointestinal research has been conducted under unrealistic conditions. In a living fish, ionic conditions, as well as levels of ammonia, pH, HCO3- and PCO2 differ considerably between the different regions of the gastrointestinal tract. These factors also differ from those of the saline often used in gut research. Furthermore, the oxygen gradient from the serosa to the gut lumen is rarely considered: in contrast to the serosa, the lumen is a hypoxic/anoxic environment. In addition, the gut microbiome plays a significant role in gut physiology, increasing the complexity of the in vivo gut, but replicating the microbial community for in vitro studies is exceptionally difficult. However, there are ways in which we can begin to overcome these challenges. Firstly, the luminal chemistry and PO2 in each gut compartment must be carefully considered. Secondly, although microbiological culture techniques are improving, we must learn how to maintain the microbiome diversity seen in vivo. Finally, for ex vivo studies, developing mucosal (luminal) solutions that more closely mimic the in vivo conditions will better replicate physiological processes. Within the field of mammalian gut physiology, great advances in 'gut-on-chip' devices are providing the tools to better replicate in vivo conditions; adopting and adapting this technology may assist in fish gut research initiatives. This Commentary aims to make fish gut physiologists aware of the various issues in replicating the in vivo conditions and identifies solutions as well as those areas that require further improvement.

Indexed as

FishesGastrointestinal TractAnimalsGastrointestinal MicrobiomeChymeGut microbiomeIntestineMucosal chemistryStomach

Identifiers

PMID39392112
PMCPMC11529878

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.