Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39391936›Full record

ArticleBJPsych bulletin2025

Individual placement and support (IPS): duration of employment support and equity of access and outcome in routine clinical practice.

Miles Rinaldi, Rachel Perkins, Robert Baxter, Paul Dorrington, Kat Saville

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BJPsych bulletin, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Miles RinaldiSouth West London and St George's Mental Health NHS Trust, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3822-1434
Rachel PerkinsImROC, Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Nottingham, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6978-5075
Robert BaxterSouth West London and St George's Mental Health NHS Trust, London, UK.
Paul DorringtonSouth West London and St George's Mental Health NHS Trust, London, UK.
Kat SavilleSouth West London and St George's Mental Health NHS Trust, London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

AIMS AND

methodTo explore the duration of support, reach, effectiveness and equity in access to and outcome of individual placement and support (IPS) in routine clinical practice. A retrospective analysis of routine cross-sectional administrative data was performed for people using the IPS service (

resultsA total of 46.2% gained or retained employment, or were supported in education. The median time to gaining employment was 132 days (4.3 months). Further, 84.7% did not require time-unlimited in-work support, and received in-work support for a median of 146 days (4.8 months). There was a significant overrepresentation of people from Black and minority ethnic communities accessing IPS, but no significant differences in outcomes by diagnosis, ethnicity, age or gender. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Most people using IPS services do not appear to need time-unlimited in-work support. Community teams with integrated IPS employment specialists can be optimistic when addressing people's recovery goals of gaining and retaining employment.

Indexed as

Evidence-based supported employmentimplementationindividual placement and supportmental illnessvocational rehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID39391936
PMCPMC12676244

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.