ArticleBJPsych open2024
'Once you've opened that can of worms': qualitative study to understand why liaison psychiatry staff are not asking about domestic abuse following self-harm.
Article in BJPsych open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Domestic violence and suicide in women under the care of mental health services in the UK, 2015-2021: a national observational study.The Lancet regional health. Europe · 2025Article
- The assessment of self-harm as a window of opportunity for addressing domestic abuse: invited editorial on Knipe et al.BJPsych open · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDomestic abuse is a significant risk factor for self-harm and suicide. A large proportion of people presenting to healthcare services following self-harm have experienced domestic abuse. In the UK, routine enquiry for domestic abuse is recommended for people who present having self-harmed, but evidence indicates that this is not happening.
aimsAn exploratory qualitative study to explore liaison psychiatry staff experiences of asking about domestic abuse, including the barriers and challenges to asking.
methodSemi-structured qualitative interviews with active adult liaison psychiatry staff in the UK. Recruitment was via online platforms and professional networks. A reflexive thematic analysis of the narratives was carried out.
resultsFifteen participants were interviewed across a variety of disciplines (ten nurses, four doctors, one social worker). The generated themes include the following: asking about domestic abuse - the tension between knowing and doing; 'delving deeper' and the fear of making things worse; the entanglement of shame, blame and despondency; domestic abuse was different from other clinical problems (mental illness/substance misuse); and biases, myths and misassumptions guiding practice. Participants indicated the need for better training and education, and clear protocols for eliciting and acting on disclosures.
conclusionThere is a clear need to improve the support offered to victim-survivors of domestic abuse who self-harm and present to healthcare services. National implementation of education and training to better equip liaison psychiatry teams with the skills and knowledge to sensitively support victim-survivors of domestic abuse is required.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.