ReviewInnovation in aging2024
Navigating Challenges and Opportunities in Community-Based Interventions for Promoting Active Aging: A Systematic Review of the Roles of Technology.
Review in Innovation in aging, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Requirements of Innovative Technologies to Promote Physical Activity Among Senior Citizens: A Systematic Literature Review.Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financingPooled it
- How digital leadership impacts community resilience: a moderated mediation model.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Implementing the ICOPE program amongst community-dwelling older adults in Singapore: a multistage implementation study protocol.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Researchers from different fields are increasingly interested in incorporating technology into community-based interventions that promote active aging. Yet, there lacks a comprehensive understanding of technology roles, posing challenges for designers seeking to maximize the intended impacts of such interventions. This systematic review aims to fill the gap by examining existing community-based interventions that integrate digital technologies to promote active aging. Research Design and Methods: Thirteen studies were screened, with a total of 14 interventions examined, following the PRISMA Guideline. Results: The challenges in designing and operating community-based interventions, the roles of technology in the interventions, and the caveats of utilizing technology during the process were identified. The review emphasizes the importance of overcoming challenges in community-based interventions and leveraging technology to enhance the intended impacts. Discussion and Implications: The findings underscore the need to understand technology's nuanced roles in community-based interventions for active aging. The article provides a starting point for accumulating knowledge and practice in utilizing technology to navigate the challenges and opportunities encountered in such interventions. It also sheds light on a notable gap: the lack of innovative and strategic approaches that harness digital interventions appropriately in community-based interventions. This emphasizes a crucial requirement for guidelines to assist designers, policymakers, and community staff in integrating technology appropriately into community-based interventions or implementing interventions that incorporate digital technologies at the community level.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.