Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39391740›Full record

ArticleiScience2024

Evolutionary insights into Felidae iris color through ancestral state reconstruction.

Julius A Tabin, Katherine A Chiasson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in iScience, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Look past the cooperative eye hypothesis: reconsidering the evolution of human eye appearance.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Julius A TabinDepartment of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA.
Katherine A ChiassonKrieger School of Arts and Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Few studies have explored eye (iris) color evolution beyond humans and domesticated animals. Felids exhibit significant eye color diversity, unlike their brown-eyed relatives, making them an ideal model to study the evolution of eye color in natural populations. Through machine learning analysis of public photographs, five felid eye colors were identified: brown, green, yellow, gray, and blue. The presence or absence of these colors was reconstructed on a phylogeny, as well as their specific quantitative shades. The ancestral felid population likely had brown-eyed and gray-eyed individuals, the latter color being pivotal for the diversification of eye color seen in modern felids. Additionally, yellow eyes are highly associated with and may be necessary for, the evolution of round pupils in felids. These findings enhance the understanding of eye color evolution, and the methods presented in this work are widely applicable and will facilitate future research into the phylogenetic reconstruction of color beyond irises.

Indexed as

Evolutionary BiologyPhylogenyZoology

Identifiers

PMID39391740
PMCPMC11465125

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.