ArticleiScience2024
Identifying key factors of reading achievement: A machine learning approach.
Article in iScience, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This article explored the influencing factors of digital reading achievement based on the PISA 2018 assessment of students' reading achievement. An integrated Random Effect-Expectation Maximization (RE-EM) regression tree model was the first constructed to address the shortcomings of traditional machine learning methods for nested data estimation and the limitations of traditional linear models in handling complex data. Our study identified the key variables for the feature selection in the integrated RE-EM regression tree model include various aspects of Meta-cognition, as well as the affective element of Joy/Liking for Reading. Notably, this study found that Meta-cognition: Assess Credibility exhibits a ceiling effect on reading achievement, where the marginal effect on reading achievement significantly diminishes at the higher variable values. Additionally, Meta-cognition: Summarizing and Joy/Liking for Reading both demonstrate an approximately S-shaped curve influence on reading achievement. These findings were discussed in critical theoretical and policy implications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.