ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2024
Neuroprotective effects of
Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Microglia-Mediated Vascular Network Remodeling After Ischemic Stroke: An Immunovascular Repair Framework.Cells · 2026Review
- Chinese herbal medicine and acupuncture reduce mortality after intracerebral hemorrhage.Journal of the Chinese Medical Association : JCMA · 2026Article
- Ethnopharmacological relevance of Chinese medicinal materials and natural products in epilepsy: a critical multi-target review integrating neurons, glia and inflammatory signaling.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Review
- Multi-omics reveals the protective mechanisms ofFrontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
- New advances in Traditional Chinese Medicine interventions for epilepsy: where are we and what do we know?Chinese medicine · 2025Review
- Integrated transcriptome and metabolome provide insight into phenolics and soluble sugar variation in the different varieties ofFrontiers in plant science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Methods: Male Sprague Dawley rats were intracerebroventricularly administered with 1% dimethyl sulfoxide 25 min before cerebral ischemia and subsequently intraperitoneally administered 0.25 g/kg (DO + TM-0.25 g), 0.5 g/kg (DO + TM-0.5 g), or 1 g/kg (DO + TM-1 g) of the TM extract after cerebral ischemia onset. Results: DO + TM-0.5 g and DO + TM-1 g treatments downregulated the following: phospho-c-Jun N-terminal kinase (p-JNK)/JNK, tumor necrosis factor (TNF) receptor-associated factor 3 (TRAF3), TRAF3-interacting JNK-activating modulator (T3JAM), p-nuclear factor-kappa B p65 (p-NF-κB p65)/NF-κB p65, ionized calcium-binding adapter molecule 1 (Iba1), CD86, TNF-α, interleukin (IL)-1β, and IL-6 expression and toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4)/Iba1, CD86/Iba1, and p-NF-κB p65/Iba1 coexpression. These treatments also upregulated IL-10, nerve growth factor, and vascular endothelial growth factor A expression and YM-1/2/Iba1 and IL-10/neuronal nuclei coexpression in the cortical ischemic rim. The JNK inhibitor SP600125 exerted similar treatment effects as the DO + TM-0.5 g and DO + TM-1 g treatments. Conclusion: DO + TM-0.5 g and DO + TM-1 g/kg treatments attenuate cerebral infarction by inhibiting JNK-mediated signaling. TM likely exerts the neuroprotective effects of promoting M1 to M2 microglial polarization by inhibiting JNK/TLR4/T3JAM/NF-κB-mediated signaling in the cortical ischemic rim 2 days after transient cerebral ischemia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.