ArticleHealth affairs scholar2024
Primary care telehealth utilization by access-challenged populations in Medicare Advantage.
Article in Health affairs scholar, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Impact of Telehealth Use Experience on Recruitment of Underserved Populations Into a Telehealth-Delivered Mindfulness-Based Trial for Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain: Cross-Sectional Survey.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2026Article
- Telemedicine Reimbursement Changes and Health Care Contact Days for Older Adults.JAMA network open · 2026Article
- Primary Care Access and the Role of Telemedicine for Traditional Medicare Beneficiaries.JAMA health forum · 2026Article
- Provider-level variation in the delivery of primary care telehealth for the rural Medicare Advantage population.The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association · 2026Article
- Utilization and quality among Medicare Advantage beneficiaries with high vs low access to telehealth.Health affairs scholar · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Although telehealth utilization in primary care has decreased markedly since 2020, it remains higher than before the COVID-19 pandemic. There is debate about its role in a post-pandemic healthcare system, particularly for certain groups of patients that may experience greater access challenges related to in-person care. To inform this debate, we examined the use of audiovisual telehealth for primary care as a share of total primary care outpatient visits among Medicare Advantage beneficiaries with and without 3 characteristics associated with potential access challenges (low-income status, disability, and frailty). Primary care visits when the beneficiary was frail were 39.4% (OR: 1.39 [95% CI, 1.37-1.42]) more likely to be telehealth; when the beneficiary was disabled or low-income status, visits were 20.1% (OR: 1.20 [95% CI, 1.18-1.22]) and 8.3% (OR: 1.08 [95% CI, 1.05-1.12]) more likely to be telehealth, respectively. The differential use of telehealth among beneficiaries with low-income status or disability, compared with those without, was significantly larger among providers with a 2-sided risk contract compared with fee for service (low-income status: OR: 1.19 [95% CI, 1.04-1.35]; disability: OR: 1.07 [95% CI, 1.01-1.13]).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.