ArticleBone reports2024
Utility of ultrasound imaging in monitoring fracture healing in rat femur: Comparison with other imaging modalities.
Article in Bone reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trial
- Evaluation of fusion status after spine fusion surgery: a comprehensive review.Asian spine journal · 2026Review
- Application of Ultrasonographic Evaluation in Conservative Treatment for Femoral Fracture During Cesarean Section: A Case Report.Case reports in orthopedics · 2026Article
- Diagnostic value of high-resolution ultrasonography and computed tomography in the diagnosis of nasal bone fracture.Pakistan journal of medical sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Fractures are common injuries and various imaging modalities are employed to diagnose and monitor bone union. However, the follow-up of fracture healing using ultrasound imaging (US) remains a topic of debate. In this study, we analyzed of fracture healing process and compared US and radiological analyses with histological analyses to clarify the characteristics and limitations of each modality. Methods: An osteotomy model was created using the femur of Wistar rats, and US, radiological (radiography and micro-computed tomography (micro-CT)), and histological analyses were performed. Radiological assessments were conducted for the evaluation of calcified tissue. The gap between the bony callus and cartilaginous callus was measured. Results: US effectively captured changes on the fracture surface, potentially reflecting the early healing processes. Both US and radiographic findings showed strong correlation in terms of the decrease in the bony callus gap. US was unable to distinguish cartilaginous callus from the surrounding soft tissue. During the remodeling stage, micro-CT offered a detailed assessment of the internal fracture surface, whereas US was limited to evaluating the outer bone surface and lacked accuracy in visualizing the entire fracture site. Radiography provided a general overview of the fractures. The decrease in the bony callus gap measured using US correlated with the reduction in cartilaginous callus observed histologically. Conclusion: This study demonstrated that US could be a valuable tool for evaluating fracture healing. Combining fracture management with US and radiological examinations may provide a more accurate assessment of healing progress.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.