Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39391563›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of nursing studies advances2024

Nurses' experiences and sense making of COVID-19 redeployment and the impact on well-being, performance, and turnover intentions: A longitudinal multimethod study.

Alice Dunning, Hannah Hartley, Kerrie Unsworth, Ruth Simms-Ellis, Michael Dunn, Angela Grange, Jenni Murray, Jayne Marran, Rebecca Lawton

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of nursing studies advances, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Alice DunningSheffield Centre for Health and Related Research (SCHARR), Division of Population Health, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, S1 4DA UK.
Hannah HartleyYorkshire Quality and Safety Research Group, Bradford Institute for Health Research, Temple Bank House, Bradford Royal Infirmary, Bradford, BD9 6RJ, UK.
Kerrie UnsworthLeeds University Business School, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS6 1AN, UK.
Ruth Simms-EllisYorkshire Quality and Safety Research Group, Bradford Institute for Health Research, Temple Bank House, Bradford Royal Infirmary, Bradford, BD9 6RJ, UK.
Michael DunnCentre for Biomedical Ethics, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, 117597, Singapore.
Angela GrangeYorkshire Quality and Safety Research Group, Bradford Institute for Health Research, Temple Bank House, Bradford Royal Infirmary, Bradford, BD9 6RJ, UK.
Jenni MurrayYorkshire Quality and Safety Research Group, Bradford Institute for Health Research, Temple Bank House, Bradford Royal Infirmary, Bradford, BD9 6RJ, UK.
Jayne MarranYorkshire Quality and Safety Research Group, Bradford Institute for Health Research, Temple Bank House, Bradford Royal Infirmary, Bradford, BD9 6RJ, UK.
Rebecca LawtonYorkshire Quality and Safety Research Group, Bradford Institute for Health Research, Temple Bank House, Bradford Royal Infirmary, Bradford, BD9 6RJ, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: During Covid-19 nurses were redeployed to new teams and specialties at a level never previously experienced. Little is known about how nurses made sense of and coped with this situation and what we can learn from this for future redeployment approaches. Objectives: We sought to understand how nurses made sense of ongoing redeployment during the COVID-19 pandemic and how this related to their psychological distress, burnout, turnover intentions, and perceived performance. Design: A longitudinal multi-method design. (ISRCTN: 18,172,749). Settings: Three acute National Health Service (NHS) Trusts in England, selected for diversity in geographical location and ethnicity, with different COVID-19 contexts. Participants: Sixty-two nurses (90 % female; 83 % white) who experienced different types of redeployment during the pandemic, with an average of 17 year's post-registration experience (mean age 41 years). Methods: We gathered both interview and survey data from 62 nurses across two or three time points in 2020-2021 and sought to find commonalities and differences in patterns of experience using Pen Portrait analysis. Results: The pandemic redeployment process was life-changing for all nurses, personally and professionally Conclusions: Nurses made sense of their experiences of redeployment during Covid-19 differently which, in turn affected their outcomes. Given the stark differences in how nurses perceived their psychological distress, burnout, turnover intentions and performance across the journeys, the importance of understanding the cues (e.g. having autonomy) associated with each journey is apparent. Thus, our research provides clear guidance for managers to help them support nurses during redeployment.

Indexed as

Covid-19Nurse redeploymentnurse staffingnurse wellbeingSensemaking

Identifiers

PMID39391563
PMCPMC11465193

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.