Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39391558›Full record

ArticleConservation physiology2024

Data needs for sea otter bioenergetics modeling.

Blaine D Griffen, Lexanne Klimes, Laura S Fletcher, Nicole M Thometz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Conservation physiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Blaine D GriffenDepartment of Biology, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT 84602, USA.
Lexanne KlimesDepartment of Biology, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT 84602, USA.
Laura S FletcherDepartment of Biology, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT 84602, USA.
Nicole M ThometzDepartment of Biology, University of San Francisco, 2130 Fulton Street, San Francisco, CA 94117, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sea otters are keystone predators whose recovery and expansion from historical exploitation throughout their range can serve to enhance local biodiversity, promote community stability, and buffer against habitat loss in nearshore marine systems. Bioenergetics models have become a useful tool in conservation and management efforts of marine mammals generally, yet no bioenergetics model exists for sea otters. Previous research provides abundant data that can be used to develop bioenergetics models for this species, yet important data gaps remain. Here we review the available data that could inform a bioenergetics model, and point to specific open questions that could be answered to more fully inform such an effort. These data gaps include quantifying energy intake through foraging by females with different aged pups in different quality habitats, the influence of body size on energy intake through foraging, and determining the level of fat storage that is possible in sea otters of different body sizes. The more completely we fill these data gaps, the more confidence we can have in the results and predictions produced by future bioenergetics modeling efforts for this species.

Indexed as

Activity budgetsBody conditionEnergy expenditureEnergy intakeEnhydra lutrisForaging behaviorMetabolismModel development

Identifiers

PMID39391558
PMCPMC11465142

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.