Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39391491›Full record

ReviewHeliyon2024

Exploring nanobioceramics in wound healing as effective and economical alternatives.

Hanan Adnan Shaker Al-Naymi, Mastafa H Al-Musawi, Marjan Mirhaj, Hamideh Valizadeh, Arefeh Momeni, Amir Mohammad Danesh Pajooh, Mina Shahriari-Khalaji, Fariborz Sharifianjazi, Ketevan Tavamaishvili, Nafise Kazemi and 3 more

Abstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Hanan Adnan Shaker Al-NaymiDepartment of Chemistry, College of Education for Pure Science/Ibn Al-Haitham, University of Baghdad, Baghdad, Iraq.
Mastafa H Al-MusawiDepartment of Clinical Laboratory Science, College of Pharmacy, Mustansiriyah University, Baghdad, Iraq.
Marjan MirhajDepartment of Materials Engineering, Isfahan University of Technology, Isfahan, 84156-83111, Iran.
Hamideh ValizadehDepartment of tissue engineering and regenerative medicine, Faculty of advanced technologies in medicine, Iran university of medical sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Arefeh MomeniDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Amirkabir University of Technology, Tehran, Iran.
Amir Mohammad Danesh PajoohDepartment of Life Science Engineering, Faculty of New Sciences and Technologies, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.
Mina Shahriari-KhalajiState Key Laboratory for Modification of Chemical Fibers and Polymer Materials, College of Materials Science and Engineering, Donghua University, Shanghai, 201620, China.
Fariborz SharifianjaziCenter for Advanced Materials and Structures, School of Science and Technology, The University of Georgia, 0171, Tbilisi, Georgia.
Ketevan TavamaishviliGeorgian American University, School of Medicine, 10 Merab Aleksidze Str., Tbilisi, 0160, Georgia.
Nafise KazemiAdvanced Materials Research Center, Department of Materials Engineering, Najafabad Branch, Islamic Azad University, Najafabad, Iran.
Saeideh SalehiAdvanced Materials Research Center, Department of Materials Engineering, Najafabad Branch, Islamic Azad University, Najafabad, Iran.
Ahmadreza ArefpourAdvanced Materials Research Center, Department of Materials Engineering, Najafabad Branch, Islamic Azad University, Najafabad, Iran.
Mohamadreza TavakoliDepartment of Materials Engineering, Isfahan University of Technology, Isfahan, 84156-83111, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Wound healing is a sophisticated process for which various treatment methods have been developed. Bioceramics with the ability to release inorganic ions in biological environments play a crucial role in cellular metabolism and exhibit bactericidal activity, contributing to numerous physiological processes. Their multifaceted roles in biological systems highlight their significance. The release of different metallic ions from bioceramics enables the repair of both hard and soft tissues. These ions may be effective in cell motility, proliferation, differentiation, adhesion, angiogenesis, and antibiosis. Unlike conventional medications, the bioactivity and antibacterial properties of bioceramics are typically not associated with side effects or bacterial resistance. Bioceramics are commonly recognized for their capcity to facilitate the healing of hard tissues due to their exceptional mechanical properties. In this review, we first explore wound treatment and its prevalent methods, and subsequently, we discuss the application of three primary categories of bioceramics-oxide ceramics, silicate-based ceramics, and calcium-phosphate ceramics-in the context of wound treatment. This review introduces bioceramics as a cost-effective and efficient alternative for wound repair. Our aim is to inspire researchers to incorporate bioceramics with other biomaterials to achieve enhanced, economical, expedited, and safer wound healing.

Indexed as

AngiogenesisAntibacterialBioceramicsInorganic ionsWound treatment

Identifiers

PMID39391491
PMCPMC11466581

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.