ArticleHeliyon2024
Efficacy of nebulized GM-CSF inhalation in preventing oral mucositis in patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: A retrospective study.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To study the efficacy of oxygen atomization inhalation of granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) for preventing oral mucositis in patients following hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Methods: Data from patients who received hematopoietic stem cell transplantation and were treated with GM-CSF for the prevention/treatment of oral mucositis in our hospital from June 2021 to June 2023 were collected. The enrolled patients were divided into an observation group and a control group according to the use of GM-CSF. The WHO Mucositis Scale Assessment Criteria were utilized to evaluate the characteristics of patients with oral mucositis (OM) from the beginning of the pretreatment period until they were discharged from the hospital. The general data, preconditioning protocol, transplantation method, overall grade and duration of oral mucositis, pain score, nutritional score and number of days of parenteral nutrition use, oral mucosal infection status and antibiotic use intensity, the granulocyte and megakaryocyte reconstruction time, and adverse reaction reports of the patients were collected and summarized through the medical records system. Results: A total of 143 patients were included in this study, including 75 patients in the observation group. In the observation group, there were 36 males and 39 females aged 22-67 years. There were 45 patients who received autologous transplantation and 30 patients who received allogeneic transplantation. In terms of the disease distribution, there were 33 cases of leukemia, 24 cases of lymphoma, 11 cases of multiple myeloma, and 8 other cases (3 cases of aplastic anemia, 2 cases of myelodysplastic syndrome, 2 cases of myelofibrosis, 1 case of POEMS syndrome). There were 68 patients in the control group, including 33 males and 35 females; the control group patients were aged 25-74years. Forty-one patients received autologous transplantation, and 27 patients received allogeneic transplantation. The disease distribution included 29 cases of leukemia, 17 cases of lymphoma, 12 cases of multiple myeloma, and 7 other cases (3 cases of aplastic anemia, 2 cases of myelodysplastic syndrome, 1 case of myelofibrosis, 1 case of POEMS syndrome). There were no significant differences between the two groups concerning age, sex, disease distribution or the transplantation method (P > 0.05). In the observation group, 13 cases did not develop oral mucositis, and 32 cases developed oral mucositis (16 cases of Grade I, 14 cases of Grade II, 2 cases of Grade III, and 0 cases of Grade IV). In the control group, there were 5 cases without mucositis and 36 cases with oral mucositis (6 cases of Grade Ⅰ, 16 cases of Grade Ⅱ, 8 cases of Grade Ⅲ, and 6 cases of Grade Ⅳ), the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). The pain score and duration of mucositis in the observation group were significantly lower than those in the control group (P < 0.05). In addition, the oral infection rate, antibiotic use intensity, nutritional score, per capita number of days of parenteral nutrition use and hematopoietic reconstruction time in the observation group were significantly lower than those in the control group (P < 0.05). In the observation group, 8 patients did not develop oral mucositis, and 22 patients developed oral mucositis (13 cases of Grade I, 7 cases of Grade II, 1 case of Grade III, and 1 case of Grade IV). In the control group, 1 case did not develop mucositis, and 26 cases developed oral mucositis (3 cases of Grade Ⅰ, 10 cases of Grade Ⅱ, 9 cases of Grade Ⅲ, and 4 cases of Grade Ⅳ). The difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). The pain score and duration of mucositis in the observation group were significantly lower than those in the control group (P < 0.05). In addition, the oral mucosal infection rate, antibiotic use intensity, nutritional score, per capita number of days of parenteral nutrition use and hematopoietic reconstruction time in the observation group were significantly lower than those in the control group (P < 0.05). No adverse reactions were reported in either group. Conclusion: In both autologous transplantation and allogeneic transplantation patients, GM-CSF atomized inhalation can improve the prevention and treatment of oral mucositis in stem cell transplantation patients, reduce the incidence of oral infection, reduce the intensity of antibiotic use and the number of days of parenteral nutrition use, and thus promote the process of hematopoietic reconstruction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.