ArticleHeliyon2024
Risk factor analysis of persistent low back pain after microdiscectomy: A retrospective study.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- A retrospective study on risk factors and the development of a comprehensive recurrent score (CR Score) for recurrence after endoscopic lumbar discectomy.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026Article
- Prediction of Osteoporosis at the Sacrum Using Opportunistic CT of the Abdomen and Pelvis: A Retrospective Feasibility Study in 277 Patients Comparing CT and QCT Data.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Surgical Management of Lumbar Disc Herniation in Elite Athletes: A Comparative Study of Microdiscectomy and Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Microdiscectomy is an effective and safe treatment for patients with symptomatic lumbar disc herniation (LDH) that is refractory to conservative interventions. However, some patients experience persistent low back pain (PLBP) after microdiscectomy that is secondary to progressive disc degeneration and segmental instability. This study aimed to clarify the definition of PLBP and analyze its prevalence and associated risk factors. Methods: This retrospective study included patients who underwent microdiscectomy for LDH at our hospital between 2015 and 2019. We divided this cohort into patients who did (PLBP group) or did not (non-PLBP group) experience PLBP after microdiscectomy and compared their clinical, radiological, and anatomical parameters. We analyzed the relationship between PLBP post-microdiscectomy and the following variables: age, sex, disk herniation level, recurrent disk herniation, body mass index (BMI), modic changes on MRI, facet subluxation, preoperative lumbar pain, and lumbosacral transitional vertebrae (LSTV). Results: PLBP after microdiscectomy was diagnosed in 99 (29.8 %) of the 332 patients enrolled in this study. Based on our multivariate logistic regression analysis, L5-S1 disc herniation level, recurrent disc herniation after microdiscectomy, obesity, modic changes on preoperative MRI, and facet subluxation were independent risk factors for PLBP post-microdiscectomy. Women and patients aged <50 years showed a trend of increased risk for developing PLBP after microdiscectomy; however, this trend did not reach statistical significance. Conclusions: PLBP after microdiscectomy is a frequent and understudied condition. We found that an L5-S1 disc herniation level, recurrent disc herniation, obesity, modic MRI changes, and facet subluxation were risk factors for PLBP after microdiscectomy. These results can help surgeons in developing a better understanding of lumbar microdiscectomy outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.