ArticleHeliyon2024
Video-based AI module with raw-scale and ROI-scale information for thyroid nodule diagnosis.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Machine Learning for diagnosis of malignant thyroid nodules based on thyroid ultrasound: Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies with external datasets.European journal of radiology open · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Ultrasound examination is a primary method for detecting thyroid lesions in clinical practice. Incorrect ultrasound diagnosis may lead to delayed treatment or unnecessary biopsy punctures. Therefore, our objective is to propose an artificial intelligence model to increase the precision of thyroid ultrasound diagnosis and reduce puncture rates. Methods: We consecutively collected ultrasound recordings from 672 patients with 845 nodules across two Chinese hospitals. This dataset was divided into training, validation, and internal test sets in a ratio of 7:1:2. We constructed and tested six different model variants based on different video feature distillation strategies and whether additional information from ROI (Region of Interest) scales was used. The models' performances were evaluated using the internal test set and an additional external test set containing 126 nodules from a third hospital. Results: The dual-stream model, which contains both raw-scale and ROI-scale streams with the time dimensional convolution layer, achieved the best performance on both internal and external test sets. On the internal test set, it achieved an AUROC (Area Under Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve) of 0.969 (95 % confidence interval, CI: 0.944-0.993) and an accuracy of 92.6 %, outperforming other variants (AUROC: 0.936-0.955, accuracy: 80.2%-88.3 %) and experienced radiologists (accuracy: 91.9 %). The AUROC of the best model in the external test was 0.931 (95 % CI: 0.890-0.972). Conclusion: Integrating a dual-stream model with additional ROI scale information and the time dimensional convolution layer can improve performance in diagnosing thyroid ultrasound videos.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.