ReviewCureus2024
Emerging Biomarkers for the Early Detection of Autoimmune Encephalitis: A Narrative Review.
Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Autoimmune Encephalitis in Acute Care-Pathology, Diagnosis, and Management.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Review
- Neuroinflammation and Mental Health in Multiple Sclerosis and Autoimmune Encephalitis: Bridging Biological Mechanisms and Psychosocial Factors.Archives of internal medicine research · 2026Article
- Multi-omics integration in autoimmune encephalitis: from novel biomarker discovery to precision therapeutic strategies.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Advances in biomarkers for optic neuritis and neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders: a multi-omics perspective.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Autoimmune encephalitis (AE) is a rare yet critical neurological disorder characterized by inflammation of the brain, typically triggered by an abnormal immune response. The early detection and diagnosis of AE are crucial for effective treatment and improved patient outcomes. However, the diagnostic process is often complicated by the diverse clinical presentations of AE, which can mimic other neurological and psychiatric conditions. Currently, diagnosis relies on a combination of clinical evaluation, neuroimaging, cerebrospinal fluid analysis, and the detection of specific autoantibodies. Despite advances in these areas, challenges remain, particularly in cases where patients are seronegative or present with nonspecific symptoms. This narrative review provides a comprehensive overview of emerging biomarkers for the early detection of AE, highlighting their potential to enhance diagnostic accuracy and speed. We explore a variety of biomarkers, including novel autoantibodies, inflammatory markers, cytokines, and neuronal damage indicators, and discuss their clinical implications. This review emphasizes the need for biomarkers that are not only sensitive and specific but also accessible and rapid to facilitate earlier diagnosis and treatment. By synthesizing current research, this review aims to contribute to the ongoing efforts to refine the diagnostic approach to AE, ultimately improving outcomes for patients affected by this challenging condition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.