Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39391422›Full record

ArticleCureus2024

Severe Retinal Damage and Choroidal Neovascularization Following Accidental Laser Exposure During Hair Removal: A Case Report.

Mohammad A Abbas, Najah K Mohammad

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Mohammad A AbbasDepartment of Surgery, Ophthalmology Unit, Ghazi Al-Harriri for Surgical Specialities Hospital, Medical City Complex, Baghdad, IRQ.
Najah K MohammadDepartment of Ophthalmology, College of Medicine, University of Baghdad, Baghdad, IRQ.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ocular injuries from cosmetic laser procedures are perhaps more problematic with regard to laser hair removal, given that some of the losses in vision may be significant and even permanent. Protective eyewear, for example, plays a very critical role in preventing such injuries. The following is a case report of a 24-year-old female technician who suffered serious retinal damage and consequent choroidal neovascularization (CNV) following accidental exposure to a laser hair removal device without wearing protective eyewear. She had first presented with a best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) of 6/6 in the right eye and 6/60 in the left. An initial optical coherence tomography (OCT) had shown outer retinal damage. Within two weeks, she had a decrease of vision to counting fingers at three meters in the left eye, and it was diagnosed as CNV. Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) intravitreal therapy was promptly initiated. This case underlines the vital importance of very strict safety measures and timely intervention to manage laser-induced ocular injury effectively.

Indexed as

anti-vegf therapychoroidal neovascularizationlaser hair removalocular injuryretinal damage

Identifiers

PMID39391422
PMCPMC11466002

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.