ArticleCureus2024
Effects of Disturbed Body Perception on Arm Function in Patients With Frozen Shoulder.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose Considering pain-related beliefs, this study aimed to investigate the influence of disturbed body perception on arm function in patients with frozen shoulder (FS). Methods This study included 90 patients with FS who visited the orthopedic outpatient clinic. We recorded measurements including the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for pain at rest and during movement, the quick disability of the arm, shoulder, and hand (QDASH) questionnaire for perceived arm function, the short version of the Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire-2 (PSEQ-2) for self-efficacy in pain, the short version of the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS-6) for catastrophic thoughts about pain, the short version of the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (TSK-11) for fear of movement, and the Fremantle Shoulder Awareness Questionnaire (FreSHAQ) for disturbed perception around the shoulder. For statistical analysis, we constructed three models. Model 1 used the QDASH score as the dependent variable, with gender, age, duration of disease onset, VAS score at rest, and VAS score during movement as control variables. Model 2 included pain-related beliefs (PSEQ-2, PCS-6, and TSK-11) added to the variables in Model 1. Model 3 further included the FreSHAQ to the variables in Model 2. We calculated the difference in the adjusted coefficients of determination (R² adj) from Model 1 to Model 2 and Model 3 to determine the amount of change (ΔR² adj). Additionally, we calculated the standardized regression coefficient (β-value) of the input factors to examine their effects. Result Hierarchical multiple regression analysis showed a ΔR² adj of 0.13 and 0.17 for Models 2 and 3, respectively, indicating an increase in ΔR²adj after adding the FreSHAQ. Furthermore, the FreSHAQ had the largest effect of all factors, with β = 0.27 (p<0.05). Conclusions The influence of disturbed body perception on perceived arm function in patients with FS was demonstrated, suggesting the importance of considering somatosensory factors in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.