ArticlePerspectives of the ASHA special interest groups2024
A Case Study of Suspected Childhood Apraxia of Sign.
Article in Perspectives of the ASHA special interest groups, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose: We provide a case report of "Zoe," a 4-year-old deaf child from a deaf signing family, who presented with a possible case of Childhood Apraxia of Sign (CASign). Method: The description is based on reports from the child's speech-language pathologist, her Individualized Education Program report, and a clinician-created sign imitation task. Results: Zoe's sign articulation errors in American Sign Language differed from those reported for typically developing deaf children and were parallel to the types of errors observed for hearing children with childhood apraxia of speech. Specifically, Zoe produced inconsistent errors across signs, substituted more complex handshapes for simple handshapes, made errors on both unmarked (common) and marked (less common) forms, produced articulatory distortions (rather than substitutions), and exhibited "groping" behaviors (a sequence of attempts to move her hands into the correct position). In addition, Zoe sometimes self-corrected her errors by manipulating her own hands, for example, using her left hand to move the thumb of her right hand into the correct position. Conclusion: Zoe's pattern of sign errors is consistent with an underlying deficit in motor planning and/or programming and may constitute the first reported case of CASign.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.