ArticleJournal of biomedical physics & engineering2024
A Neural Network-based Approach to Prediction of Preterm Birth using Non-invasive Tests.
Article in Journal of biomedical physics & engineering, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Machine learning to predict adverse perinatal outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.EClinicalMedicine · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence assisted common maternal fetal planes prediction from ultrasound images based on information fusion of customized convolutional neural networks.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: One of the main reasons for neonatal deaths is preterm delivery, and infants who have survived preterm birth (PB) are at risk of significant health complications. However, an effective method for reliable and accurate prediction of preterm labor has yet to be proposed. Objective: This study proposes an artificial neural network (ANN)-based approach for early prediction of PB, and consequently can hint physicians to start the treatment earlier, reducing the chance of morbidity and mortality in the infant. Material and Methods: This historical cohort study proposes a feed-forward ANN with 7 hidden neurons to predict PB. Thirteen risk factors of PB were collected from 300 pregnant women (150 with preterm delivery and 150 normal) as the ANN inputs from 2018 to 2019. From each group, 70%, 15%, and 15% of the subjects were randomly selected for training, validation, and testing of the model, respectively. Results: The ANN achieved an accuracy of 79.03% for the classification of the subjects into two classes normal and PB. Moreover, a sensitivity of 73.45% and specificity of 84.62% were obtained. The advantage of this approach is that the risk factors used for prediction did not require any lab test and were collected in a questionnaire. Conclusion: The efficacy of the proposed approach for the early identification of pregnant women, who are at high risk of preterm delivery, leads to necessary care and clinical interventions, applied during the pregnancy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.