ArticleTechnical innovations & patient support in radiation oncology2024
Dealing with rectum motion during radiotherapy: How can we anticipate it?
Article in Technical innovations & patient support in radiation oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Regional patterns of incidental pelvic nodal irradiation during bladder-only radiotherapy: A paired dosimetric analysis of VMAT and IMRT.Clinical and translational radiation oncology · 2026Article
- Comparison of deep learning-based segmentation and registration using pre-treatment contours for online rectal delineation in magnetic resonance-guided radiotherapy.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2025Article
- Investigation of changes in planning target volume and regression probability of rectal boost using in-silico cone-beam computed tomography-guided online-adaptive radiotherapy.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Intra- and inter-fraction rectum motion is important for pelvic radiotherapy (RT). This study assesses how RT session duration, the presence or the absence of an intra-rectal tumour, and the distance from the anorectal junction (ARJd) impact rectal motion. Materials and methods: Analyses used cone-beam computed tomographies (CBCTs) from RT patients treated for rectal and prostate cancer. Three structures were evaluated: (1) the entire rectum in patients without a rectal tumour (Rectum Results: We included 10 patients with and 10 without rectal cancer, collecting 385 CBCTs. A significant correlation (p < 0.05) between rectum motion and RT session duration was found. Intrafraction motion was significantly higher in prostate cancer patients (Rectum Conclusions: Session duration, absence of a tumour, and ARJd are associated with larger intra- and interfraction rectal motion. This highlights the need for tailored RT treatment, including online-adaptive RT, to manage intra- and interfraction variations. Rectal motion should be handled differently for patients with prostate cancer and those with rectal cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.