Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39391228›Full record

ArticleContemporary clinical trials communications2024

The safety and feasibility of transcranial direct current stimulation combined with conservative treatment for patients with cervicogenic headaches: A double-blinded randomized control study protocol.

K Jobin, C Campbell, S M Schabrun, K J Schneider, A Smith, C T Debert

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Contemporary clinical trials communications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05582616 (The Safety and Feasibility of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Combined With Conservative Treatment for Cervicogenic Headaches), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05582616 nacompletednot on this map

The Safety and Feasibility of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Combined With Conservative Treatment for Cervicogenic Headaches

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of CalgaryRan2022 to 2024Enrolled32ConditionsCervicogenic HeadacheArmsTranscranial Direct Current Stimulation, Sham Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Interventional neuromodulation techniques for cervicogenic headache.Journal of anesthesia and translational medicine · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

K JobinDepartment of Clinical Neurosciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
C CampbellDepartment of Clinical Neurosciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
S M SchabrunDepartment of Physiotherapy, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada.
K J SchneiderHotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
A SmithDepartment of Clinical Neurosciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
C T DebertDepartment of Clinical Neurosciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Alberta, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Cervicogenic headaches (CGH) are common following concussion and whiplash injuries and significantly reduce patient quality of life. Conservative therapies such as ET (ET) and physiotherapy combined with injection-based therapies are cornerstones of treatment for CGH but have shown limited efficacy. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) over the primary motor cortex (M1) has shown promise in treating other chronic pain conditions. The primary aim of this trial is to evaluate the feasibility and safety of tDCS when combined with ET for the treatment of CGH. Methods: Adults (aged 18-65), blinded to treatment arm, will be randomized into one of two groups: active tDCS followed by ET or sham tDCS followed by ET. Transcranial direct current stimulation will be applied over M1 three times per week for 6-weeks and ET will be performed daily. The primary outcomes of this trial will be the feasibility and safety of the intervention. Feasibility will be defined as greater than 30 % recruitment, 70 % protocol adherence, and 80 % retention rate. Safety will be defined as no severe adverse events. Secondary exploratory outcomes will assess improvement in pain, strength, function, and quality of life. Conclusions: This trial aims to demonstrate the safety and feasibility of tDCS in combination with ET for the treatment of CGH. Cervicogenic headaches can be difficult to treat contributing to significant impairments function and quality of life. Transcranial direct current stimulation is a potential novel treatment to improve health outcomes in these patients. Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov-NCT05582616.

Indexed as

Cervicogenic headacheChronic painExerciseMotor cortexNeuromodulationPhysiotherapyPost-traumatic headacheTranscranial direct current stimulation

Identifiers

PMID39391228
PMCPMC11464253

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.