Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39391217›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2024

Contamination of liposomal bupivacaine during multi-dose usage in a clinical setting evaluated by culture and PCR.

Rachel L Melvin, Jing Wu, Brad S Bennett, Sara D Lawhon, Amy Savarino, Artem S Rogovskyy, Kelley M Thieman Mankin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Assessing Ethiqa XR Sterility Past the "Beyond-Discard Date" Under Conditions of Maximum Usage.Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Rachel L MelvinDepartment of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, Texas A&M University College of Veterinary Medicine & Biomedical Sciences, College Station, TX, United States.
Jing WuVeterinary Medical Teaching Hospital, Texas A&M University College of Veterinary Medicine & Biomedical Sciences, College Station, TX, United States.
Brad S BennettDepartment of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, Texas A&M University College of Veterinary Medicine & Biomedical Sciences, College Station, TX, United States.
Sara D LawhonDepartment of Veterinary Pathobiology, Texas A&M University College of Veterinary Medicine & Biomedical Sciences, College Station, TX, United States.
Amy SavarinoVeterinary Medical Teaching Hospital, Texas A&M University College of Veterinary Medicine & Biomedical Sciences, College Station, TX, United States.
Artem S RogovskyyDepartment of Veterinary Pathobiology, Texas A&M University College of Veterinary Medicine & Biomedical Sciences, College Station, TX, United States.
Kelley M Thieman MankinDepartment of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, Texas A&M University College of Veterinary Medicine & Biomedical Sciences, College Station, TX, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Liposomal bupivacaine, a long-acting local anesthetic, is sold in single-dose vials at a cost of approximately $200/20 mL vial. As many veterinary patients are not dosed an entire vial, the vials have been used for multiple doses at our institution to provide cost savings. Multiple punctures of a vial can lead to increased opportunity for contamination of the contents. This study aims to describe our institutional procedure for multi-dose use of single-dose liposomal bupivacaine vials and to evaluate clinically utilized liposomal bupivacaine for bacterial and fungal contamination using molecular and bacteriological methods. Methods: The first (Control) and last (Sample B) 0.5 mL from each vial were collected and submitted for bacterial and fungal PCR, anaerobic and aerobic bacterial culture, and opportunistic fungal culture. Results: All 40 bacterial cultures yielded no growth; Bacterial or fungal DNA was identified in 19 samples (50%). Of the 19 samples in which bacterial or fungal DNA was identified, 10 (52.6%) were from Control, and 9 (47.4%) were from Sample B. PCR does not appear to be useful in detecting bacterial or fungal contamination from liposomal bupivacaine. Discussion: Results support the aseptic handling protocol described in this article is successful in preventing detectable bacterial and fungal contamination of liposomal bupivacaine vials for up to 7 individual punctures and vials open for up to 5 days.

Indexed as

bupivacainecultureliposomalmulti-doseNOCITA™PCR

Identifiers

PMID39391217
PMCPMC11465754

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.