ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2024
Contamination of liposomal bupivacaine during multi-dose usage in a clinical setting evaluated by culture and PCR.
Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Assessing Ethiqa XR Sterility Past the "Beyond-Discard Date" Under Conditions of Maximum Usage.Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS · 2026Article
- Silver nanoparticles synthesised using endophytic fungus Calonectria eucalypti from medicinal plant axifraga stolonifera and their bioactivity.Journal, genetic engineering & biotechnology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Liposomal bupivacaine, a long-acting local anesthetic, is sold in single-dose vials at a cost of approximately $200/20 mL vial. As many veterinary patients are not dosed an entire vial, the vials have been used for multiple doses at our institution to provide cost savings. Multiple punctures of a vial can lead to increased opportunity for contamination of the contents. This study aims to describe our institutional procedure for multi-dose use of single-dose liposomal bupivacaine vials and to evaluate clinically utilized liposomal bupivacaine for bacterial and fungal contamination using molecular and bacteriological methods. Methods: The first (Control) and last (Sample B) 0.5 mL from each vial were collected and submitted for bacterial and fungal PCR, anaerobic and aerobic bacterial culture, and opportunistic fungal culture. Results: All 40 bacterial cultures yielded no growth; Bacterial or fungal DNA was identified in 19 samples (50%). Of the 19 samples in which bacterial or fungal DNA was identified, 10 (52.6%) were from Control, and 9 (47.4%) were from Sample B. PCR does not appear to be useful in detecting bacterial or fungal contamination from liposomal bupivacaine. Discussion: Results support the aseptic handling protocol described in this article is successful in preventing detectable bacterial and fungal contamination of liposomal bupivacaine vials for up to 7 individual punctures and vials open for up to 5 days.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.