Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39391214›Full record

Article3 Biotech2024

Advancing epigenetic profiling in cervical cancer: machine learning techniques for classifying DNA methylation patterns.

Apoorva, Vikas Handa, Shalini Batra, Vinay Arora

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in 3 Biotech, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

ApoorvaDepartment of Biotechnology, Thapar Institute of Engineering & Technology, Patiala, India.ORCID 0009-0008-4463-2436
Vikas HandaDepartment of Biotechnology, Thapar Institute of Engineering & Technology, Patiala, India.
Shalini BatraComputer Science & Engineering Department, Thapar Institute of Engineering & Technology, Patiala, India.
Vinay AroraComputer Science & Engineering Department, Thapar Institute of Engineering & Technology, Patiala, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study investigates the ability to predict DNA methylation patterns in cervical cancer cells using decision-tree-based ensemble approaches and neural network-based models. The research findings suggest that a model based on random forest achieves a significant prediction accuracy of 91.35%. This projection was derived from comprehensive experimentation and a meticulous performance evaluation of the random forest model, employing a range of measures including Accuracy, Sensitivity, Specificity, Matthews Correlation Coefficient, F1-score, Recall, and Precision. The results indicate that the random forest model exhibits superior performance compared to other tree-based models such as the Simple Decision Tree and XGBoost, as well as neural network-based models including Convolutional Neural Networks, Feed Forward Networks, and Wavelet Neural Networks. The findings indicate that using random forest-based techniques has great potential for future study and might be highly valuable in clinical applications, especially in improving diagnostic and treatment strategies based on epigenetic profiles.

Indexed as

Deep learningDNA methylationEpigeneticsMachine learningUterine cervical cancer

Identifiers

PMID39391214
PMCPMC11461404

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.