ArticleCytoJournal2024
The impact of anthropometric parameters and sonographic characteristics on the choice of biopsy method for thyroid nodules: Fine-needle aspiration versus non-aspiration biopsy.
Article in CytoJournal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: The accurate diagnosis of thyroid nodules is crucial for effective management and the detection of malignancy. Fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) and fine-needle non-aspiration biopsy (FNNAB) are widely used techniques for evaluating thyroid nodules. In this study, we aimed to investigate the impact of anthropometric parameters and sonographic characteristics on the choice between FNAB and FNNAB in terms of diagnostic yield. Material and Methods: This retrospective and cross-sectional analysis involved 188 cases with a total of 225 thyroid nodules. Each nodule initially underwent either FNAB or FNNAB and if the initial biopsy did not yield a diagnostic result, the nodule was re-biopsied using the alternate technique. Ultrasound was used to evaluate the nodules, with a focus on echogenicity, calcifications, size, vascularity, and the presence of a halo sign. Both FNAB and FNNAB were performed using a 25-gauge needle, with the only difference being the application of suction. Results: FNAB demonstrated a higher diagnostic rate for nodules with a taller-than-wide shape (anteroposteriorto-transverse ratio ≥1), nodules sized 10-40 mm, nodules with volumes <0.5 cc, and hypoechoic nodules ( Conclusion: Anthropometric parameters and sonographic characteristics influenced the diagnostic yield of FNAB and FNNAB, with FNAB generally demonstrating superior results. Given the importance of obtaining an accurate diagnostic result from fine-needle biopsy, clinicians should consider both the sonographic features of the nodule and the anthropometric measurements of the patient when selecting a biopsy technique.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.