ArticleBehavior analysis in practice2024
Evaluating Social Validity to Inform Intervention Development: Qualitative Analysis of Caregiver Interviews.
Article in Behavior analysis in practice, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluating the Effects of Skill-Based Treatment: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Single-Case Studies.Journal of autism and developmental disorders · 2026Article
- Subjective Can Be Scary-But Worth It: Personal Reflections on How Qualitative Methods Can Advance Applied Behavior Analysis.Behavior analysis in practice · 2026Article
- Utility of Qualitative Methods to Expand Behavior-Analytic Perspectives: A Reflection.Behavior analysis in practice · 2026Article
- Characteristics of Qualitative Research in BehaviorBehavior analysis in practice · 2026Article
- Exploring the Epistemological Significance of Qualitative Research in Behavior Analysis.Behavior analysis in practice · 2026Article
- Addressing Pervasive Myths About Qualitative Research to Promote Methodological Diversity in Applied Behavior Analysis.Behavior analysis in practice · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Evaluating social validity of interventions is paramount to the applied dimension of applied behavior analysis, but in research contexts, social validity is frequently assessed only after an intervention has concluded. The present study sought to evaluate the social validity of a proposed intervention prior to intervention development through qualitative analysis of interviews with stakeholders. We interviewed ten caregivers of children with autism about their experiences and challenges engaging in play with their children. We also solicited their opinions on the proposed components of the intervention, including (1) video models; (2) smart speaker prompts; and (3) feedback and coaching via video chat. Qualitative analysis of the interview transcripts revealed several domains related to caregivers' experiences, including challenges with social communication, openness to learning skills, and desires to build connections with one's child. Opinions about the proposed intervention components were largely positive, citing the convenience of using technology to access the mostly asynchronous intervention. Some participants expressed hesitation or discomfort surrounding feedback and coaching via video chat. Participants made several helpful suggestions regarding the content and features of the intervention. We discuss our findings in the context of an interactive social validation process.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.