ArticleInternational journal of clinical pediatric dentistry2024
Comparative Evaluation of Shear Bond Strength of Bonded Space Maintainers Using Ormocers, Nanofilled and Glass Fiber-reinforced Adhesive Composites.
Article in International journal of clinical pediatric dentistry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06811597 (The Effects of Fixed Space Maintainers Luting with Self-Adhesive Resin Cement on the Gingival Crevicular Fluid of Interleukin-18 Level), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
The Effects of Fixed Space Maintainers Luting with Self-Adhesive Resin Cement on the Gingival Crevicular Fluid of Interleukin-18 Level
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Space maintainers (SMs) are used to preserve the space created by premature loss of primary teeth. The most commonly used is the band and loop (B&L) SM. As this SM has several drawbacks, such as poor esthetics and gingival health, laboratory procedures for fabrication, and multiple seating procedures, various bonded SMs were introduced. This study aims to compare the shear bond strength of bonded SMs using ormocer, nanofilled, and short glass fiber-reinforced adhesive composites with the conventional B&L SM luted with type I glass ionomer cement (GIC). Materials and methods: Sixty intact extracted primary molars were randomly divided into four groups ( Results: The highest shear bond strength, that is, 68.82 ± 16.81 MPa, was exhibited by GFRC, followed by 51.04 ± 23.28 MPa with nanofilled composite, 45.3 ± 18.27 MPa with ormocer, and the least in the control group, that is, 42.17 ± 17 MPa. Conclusion: Glass fiber-reinforced resin composite has better resistance against shear force than the other three study materials, and this was significantly higher ( How to cite this article: Barathi D, Jampanapalli SR, Patloth T,
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.