ArticleThe journal of allergy and clinical immunology. Global2024
Incidence of cardiovascular events in a population-based Danish cohort with atopic dermatitis.
Article in The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. Global, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Efficacy and Safety of Upadacitinib in Patients With Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis: Phase 3 Randomized Clinical Trial Results Through 140 Weeks.American journal of clinical dermatology · 2025Trial
- Depression, Anxiety, and Bipolar Disorder and Atherosclerosis.Current atherosclerosis reports · 2026Review
- Cardiovascular risk among middle-aged Japanese adults with atopic dermatitis: A nested case-control study.PloS one · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The risk of cardiovascular disease in atopic dermatitis (AD) is not well established. Objectives: Our aims were to evaluate the incidence rate (IR) of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients with AD in a population-based cohort study and to assess atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk factors and incidence of malignancies, major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), and VTE in patients with AD and rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in a nested cohort analysis. Methods: Data from individuals age 12 years or older (nested cohort age ≥ 18 years) from January 1, 2000, to December 31, 2018, were extracted from the Danish National Patient Registry. Patients with AD were age- and sex-matched with 10 healthy controls. ASCVD risk factors included age 65 years or older and history of smoking, coronary artery disease, stroke, deep vein thrombosis (DVT), pulmonary embolism (PE), and malignancy. Results: The population-based cohort comprised 190,751 patients (17,341 patients with AD and 173,410 healthy controls). The IRs per 100 patient-years were comparable between the AD cohort and healthy controls for VTE (0.14 [95% CI = 0.12-0.16] vs 0.11 [95% CI = 0.11-0.12]), DVT (0.08 [95% CI = 0.06-0.09] vs 0.06 [95% CI = 0.06-0.07]), and PE (0.06 [95% CI = 0.05-0.08] vs 0.05 [95% CI = 0.05-0.05]). The IR for VTE was higher in the AD cohort age 65 years or older (0.71 [95% CI = 0.56-0.90]) than in the age-matched controls (0.50 [95% CI = 0.46-0.54]). ASCVD risk factors were more frequent in the patients with RA than in the patients with AD. The IRs for malignancies and MACE were higher with specific ASCVD risk factors. Conclusions: The IRs of cardiovascular events were comparable between the AD cohort and general population. The risk of VTE, malignancy, or MACE was higher with specific ASCVD risk factors, underscoring the need for patient monitoring.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.