ArticleNeurotrauma reports2024
Neuromodulation in Spinal Cord Injury Using Transcutaneous Spinal Stimulation-Mapping for a Blood Pressure Response: A Case Series.
Article in Neurotrauma reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06841198 (Assessing Cardiovascular Effects), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Assessing Cardiovascular Effects: Is There a Time Too Early for Spinal Stimulation in Acute SCI? A Year-Long Evaluation of Autonomic Function Following Injury
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Spinal cord stimulation to manage autonomic dysfunction after spinal cord injury: a systematic review.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2026Pooled it
- Cardiovascular effects of transcutaneous spinal stimulation in persons living with and without spinal cord injury.Spinal cord · 2026Article
- Spinal cord neuromodulation for autonomic recovery following spinal cord injury: a scoping review.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2026Article
- Article
- Short-Term Repeated Transcutaneous Spinal Cord Stimulation Yields Sustained Orthostatic Benefits in Chronic Cervical SCI: A Case Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- A scoping review of neuromodulation techniques for controlling blood pressure: what are the ups and downs to this approach?Bioelectronic medicine · 2025Review
- Cumulative Transcutaneous Spinal Stimulation with Locomotor Training Safely Improves Trunk Control in Children with Spinal Cord Injury: Pilot Study.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Cardiovascular safety of transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation in cervical spinal cord injury.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2025Article
- Article
- Autonomic dysfunction and hemodynamic management after acute spinal cord injury: blood pressure targets, perfusion strategies, and emerging therapies.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Spinal cord transcutaneous stimulation (scTS) offers a promising approach to enhance cardiovascular regulation in individuals with a high-level spinal cord injury (SCI), addressing the challenges of unstable blood pressure (BP) and the accompanying hypo- and hypertensive events. While scTS offers flexibility in stimulation locations, it also leads to significant variability and lack of validation in stimulation sites utilized by studies. Our study presents findings from a case series involving eight individuals with chronic cervical SCI, examining the hemodynamic effects of scTS applied in different vertebral locations, spanning from high cervical to sacral regions. Stimulation of the lumbosacral vertebrae region (L1/2, S1/2, and also including T11/12) significantly elevated BP, unlike cervical or upper thoracic stimulation. The observed trend, which remained consistent across different participants, highlights the promising role of lumbosacral stimulation in neuromodulating BP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.