Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39391015›Full record

ArticleEClinicalMedicine2024

Increase in colonic PRopionate as a method of prEVENTing weight gain over 12 months in adults aged 20-40 years (iPREVENT): a multi-centre, double-blind, randomised, parallel-group trial.

Jennifer E Pugh, Katerina Petropoulou, Joana C Vasconcelos, Aisha Anjum, George Thom, Louise McCombie, Martina Tashkova, Sumayya Alshehhi, Daphne Babalis, Leah Holroyd and 9 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Short-chain fatty acids.Nature metabolism · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Jennifer E PughSection for Nutrition, Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Katerina PetropoulouSection for Nutrition, Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Joana C VasconcelosNightingale-Saunders Clinical Trials & Epidemiology Unit, King's Clinical Trials Unit, King's College London, London, UK.
Aisha AnjumImperial Clinical Trials Unit, School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK.
George ThomSchool of Medicine, Dentistry and Nursing, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, UK.
Louise McCombieSchool of Medicine, Dentistry and Nursing, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, UK.
Martina TashkovaSection for Nutrition, Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Sumayya AlshehhiSection for Nutrition, Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Daphne BabalisImperial Clinical Trials Unit, School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Leah HolroydStudy Advisory Group Member.
Barzan A SadiqStudy Advisory Group Member.
Christina PrechtlImperial Clinical Trials Unit, School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Tom PrestonScottish Universities Environmental Research Centre (SUERC), College of Science and Engineering, University of Glasgow, UK.
Edward ChambersSection for Nutrition, Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Mike J LeanSchool of Medicine, Dentistry and Nursing, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, UK.
Waljit DhilloDivision of Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolism, Imperial College London, UK.
A Toby PrevostNightingale-Saunders Clinical Trials & Epidemiology Unit, King's Clinical Trials Unit, King's College London, London, UK.
Douglas MorrisonScottish Universities Environmental Research Centre (SUERC), College of Science and Engineering, University of Glasgow, UK.
Gary FrostSection for Nutrition, Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Obesity drives metabolic disease development. Preventing weight gain during early adulthood could mitigate later-life chronic disease risk. Increased dietary fibre intake, leading to enhanced colonic microbial fermentation and short-chain fatty acid (SCFA) production, is associated with lower body weight. Despite national food policy recommendations to consume 30 g of dietary fibre daily, only 9% of adults achieve this target. Inulin-propionate ester (IPE) selectively increases the production of the SCFA propionate in the colon. In previous studies, IPE has prevented weight gain in middle-aged adults over 6 months, compared with the inulin control. IPE is a novel food ingredient that can be added to various commonly consumed foods with a potential health benefit. This 12-month study aimed to determine whether using IPE to increase colonic propionate prevents further weight gain in overweight younger adults. Methods: This multi-centre randomised-controlled, double-blind trial was conducted in London and Glasgow, UK. Recruited participants were individuals at risk of weight gain, aged between 20 and 40 years and had an overweight body mass index. Sealed Envelope Software was used to randomise participants to consume 10 g of IPE or inulin (control), once per day for 12 months. The primary outcome was the weight gained from baseline to 12 months, analysed by an 'Intention to Treat' strategy. The safety profile and tolerability of IPE were monitored through adverse events and compliance. This study is registered with the International Standard Randomised Controlled Trials (ISRCT) Database (ISRCT number: 16299902). Findings: Participants (n = 135 per study arm) were recruited from July 2019 to October 2021. At 12 months, there was no significant difference in baseline-adjusted mean weight gain for IPE compared with control (1.02 kg, 95% CI: -0.37 to 2.41; p = 0.15; n = 226). Neither the IPE (+1.22 kg) nor the control arm (+0.07 kg) unadjusted mean gains in body weight reached the expected 2 kg threshold. In the IPE arm, fat-free mass was greater by 1.07 kg (95% CI: 0.21-1.93), and blood glucose elevated by 0.11 mmol/L (95% CI: 0.01-0.21). Compliance, determined by intake of ≥50% sachets, was reached by 63% of IPE participants. There were no unexpected adverse events or safety concerns. Interpretation: Our study indicates that at 12 months, IPE did not differentially affect weight gain, compared with the inulin control, in adults between 20 and 40 years of age, at risk of obesity. Funding: NIHR EME Programme (15/185/16).

Indexed as

Dietary fibreGut microbiotaObesityPreventionShort-chain fatty acids

Identifiers

PMID39391015
PMCPMC11466568

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.