Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39390996›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in nuclear medicine2022

Historical efforts to develop

Ghazaleh Takalloobanafshi, Aditi Kukreja, Justin W Hicks

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in nuclear medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ghazaleh TakalloobanafshiDepartment of Chemistry, Western University, London, ON, Canada.
Aditi KukrejaDepartment of Medical Biophysics, Western University, London, ON, Canada.
Justin W HicksCyclotron and Radiochemistry Facility, Lawson Health Research Institute, London, ON, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Imaging biomarkers have changed the way we study Alzheimer's disease and related dementias, develop new therapeutics to treat the disease, and stratify patient populations in clinical trials. With respect to protein aggregates comprised of amyloid-β plaques and tau neurofibrillary tangles, Positron Emission Tomography (PET) has become the gold standard imaging modality for quantitative visualization. Due to high infrastructural costs, the availability of PET remains limited to large urban areas within high income nations. This limits access to leading edge medical imaging, and potentially access to new treatments, by millions of rural and remote residents in those regions as well as billions of people in middle- and low-income countries. Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography (SPECT) is a more widely available imaging alternative with lower infrastructural costs and decades of familiarity amongst nuclear medicine professionals. Recent technological advances have closed the gap in spatial resolution and quantitation between SPECT and PET. If effective SPECT radiotracers were available to visualize amyloid-β plaques, geographic barriers to imaging could be circumvented. In this review, we will discuss past efforts to develop SPECT radiotracers targeting amyloid-β plaques which incorporate the most used radionuclide in nuclear medicine: technetium-99m (

Indexed as

Alzheimer's diseaseradiotracer developmentrural and remote accesssingle photon emission computed tomography (SPECT)technetium

Identifiers

PMID39390996
PMCPMC11466234

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.