Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39390990›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2024

White blood cell counts can predict 4-year cardiovascular disease risk in patients with stable coronary heart disease: a prospective cohort study.

Wencai Jiang, Gang Huang, Jinfeng Du, Hanxuan Yang, Shiheng Zhou, Dayin Dai, Kai Tang, Lingxiao Fang, Xiao Wang, Xuejun Deng

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00799903 (LPL100601, A Clinical Outcomes Study of Darapladib Versus Placebo in Subjects With Chronic Coronary Heart Disease to Compare the Incidence of Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00799903 phase3completednot on this map

LPL100601, A Clinical Outcomes Study of Darapladib Versus Placebo in Subjects With Chronic Coronary Heart Disease to Compare the Incidence of Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events (MACE)

TypeinterventionalSponsorGlaxoSmithKlineRan2008 to 2013Enrolled15,828ConditionsAtherosclerosisArmsDarapladib, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Wencai Jiang *Department of Cardiology, Suining Central Hospital, Suining, Sichuan, China.
Gang Huang *Department of Cardiology, Suining Central Hospital, Suining, Sichuan, China.
Jinfeng DuDepartment of Hematology, Chongqing Emergency Medical Center, Chongqing, China.
Hanxuan YangDepartment of Cardiology, Suining Central Hospital, Suining, Sichuan, China.
Shiheng ZhouDepartment of Cardiology, Suining Central Hospital, Suining, Sichuan, China.
Dayin DaiDepartment of Cardiology, Suining Central Hospital, Suining, Sichuan, China.
Kai TangDepartment of Cardiology, Suining Central Hospital, Suining, Sichuan, China.
Lingxiao FangDepartment of Cardiology, Suining Central Hospital, Suining, Sichuan, China.
Xiao WangDepartment of Cardiology, Suining Central Hospital, Suining, Sichuan, China.
Xuejun DengDepartment of Cardiology, Suining Central Hospital, Suining, Sichuan, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The prevalence of cardiovascular disease has increased sharply in the Asian population, and evaluation of the risk of cardiovascular events with stable coronary heart disease remains challenging. The role of white blood cell (WBC) count in assisting clinical decision-making in this setting is still unclear. Objectives: This study sought to evaluate the prognostic meaning of WBC count among patients with stable coronary heart disease. Methods: This study included Asian participants ( Results: In the lower WBC count quartiles, patients had lower-risk clinical profiles. Higher WBC counts were associated with greater event probabilities for cardiovascular death, major cardiovascular events, or all-cause death. In Cox regression models, WBC counts were an independent predictor of major adverse cardiovascular events (OR = 2.445, 95% CI 1.427-4.190, Conclusions: In patients with stable coronary heart disease, higher WBC counts were associated with a heightened risk for the primary or secondary outcomes. Registration: https://clinicaltrials.gov/; Unique identifier NCT00799903.

Indexed as

cardiovascular diseasecardiovascular eventsrisk factorsstable coronary heart diseasewhite blood cell (WBC) count

Identifiers

PMID39390990
PMCPMC11464350

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.