ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2024
Surmounting the summit: tackling cerebral malperfusion in AMDS-treated acute deBakey I dissections. A case report.
Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Acute Type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) with supra-aortic branch (SAB) malperfusion remains a formidable clinical challenge, often resulting in high mortality and complex treatment dilemmas. The introduction of the AMDS represents a significant innovation, designed to stabilize the aortic arch, and manage malperfusion effectively. Methods: This case study evaluates the utility of AMDS in the treatment of a 63-year-old male with hypertension, who presented with severe, acute chest pain. Diagnosed with a DeBakey type I ATAAD involving SAB, the patient underwent cardiopulmonary bypass, aortic root replacement, aortic arch repair with AMDS implantation, and subsequent endovascular stenting for severe left common carotid artery malperfusion that developed postoperatively. The AMDS was instrumental in facilitating crucial aortic arch reconstruction and addressing the initial severe malperfusion. Despite postoperative cerebral malperfusion, targeted endovascular stenting resulted in a rapid and substantial neurological recovery. The patient was discharged to a rehabilitation facility on postoperative day 20, free of neurological deficits. Conclusions: The use of AMDS in managing ATAAD with SAB involvement is transformative, enabling less invasive surgical techniques and offering immediate, effective correction of malperfusion. This case underscores the essential role of integrating advanced endovascular strategies to enhance outcomes in high-risk aortic surgeries, marking a pivotal advancement in the therapeutic approach to complex aortic dissections
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.