Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39390851›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of haematology2025

Real-World Evidence on Prognostic Value of MRD in Multiple Myeloma Using Flow Cytometry.

Ludmila Muronova, Ondrej Soucek, David Zihala, Tereza Sevcikova, Tereza Popkova, Hana Plonkova, Ondrej Venglar, Ludek Pour, Martin Stork, Lucie Rihova and 13 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of haematology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors.

Ludmila MuronovaDepartment of Hematooncology, University Hospital Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-8589-1577
Ondrej SoucekInstitute of Clinical Immunology and Allergology, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital and Charles University, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic.
David ZihalaDepartment of Hematooncology, University Hospital Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic.
Tereza SevcikovaDepartment of Hematooncology, University Hospital Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic.
Tereza PopkovaDepartment of Hematooncology, University Hospital Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic.
Hana PlonkovaDepartment of Hematooncology, University Hospital Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic.
Ondrej VenglarDepartment of Hematooncology, University Hospital Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic.
Ludek PourDepartment of Internal Medicine, Hematology and Oncology, University Hospital Brno and Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.
Martin StorkDepartment of Internal Medicine, Hematology and Oncology, University Hospital Brno and Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7072-8537
Lucie RihovaDepartment of Clinical Hematology, University Hospital Brno, Brno, Czech Republic.
Renata BezdekovaDepartment of Clinical Hematology, University Hospital Brno, Brno, Czech Republic.
Jiri MinarikDepartment of Hemato-Oncology, University Hospital Olomouc and Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University, Olomouc, Czech Republic.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0513-326X
Vojtech LátalDepartment of Hemato-Oncology, University Hospital Olomouc and Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
Martin NovakDepartment of Hemato-Oncology, University Hospital Olomouc and Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
Alexandra JungovaHematology and Oncology Department, Charles University Hospital Pilsen, Pilsen, Czech Republic.
Tereza DekojovaHematology and Oncology Department, Charles University Hospital Pilsen, Pilsen, Czech Republic.
Jan Straub1st Medical Department-Clinical Department of Haematology of the First Faculty of Medicine and General Teaching Hospital Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
Martin Spacek1st Medical Department-Clinical Department of Haematology of the First Faculty of Medicine and General Teaching Hospital Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
Vladimira RezacovaInstitute of Clinical Immunology and Allergology, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital and Charles University, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic.
Vladimir Maisnar4th Department of Internal Medicine-Hematology, University Hospital Hradec Kralove, Charles University, Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Kralove, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic.
Jakub Radocha4th Department of Internal Medicine-Hematology, University Hospital Hradec Kralove, Charles University, Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Kralove, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic.
Roman HajekDepartment of Hematooncology, University Hospital Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6955-6267
Tomas JelinekDepartment of Hematooncology, University Hospital Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic.

Funding

Czech Health Research Council NU23-03-00374Czech Health Research Council NW24-03-00347European Union project LERCO CZ.10.03.01/00/22_003/0000003Institutional support MH CZ-DRO-FNOs/2022Institutional support MH CZ-DRO-FNOs/2023Institutional support MH CZ-DRO-FNOs/2024Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic through the e-INFRA CZ ID:90254Ministry of Health of the Czech Republic FNBr 65 269 705SALVAGE project CZ.02.01.01/00/22_008/0004644
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Minimal residual disease (MRD) is one of the most important prognostic factors in multiple myeloma (MM) and a valid surrogate for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Recently, MRD negativity was approved as an early clinical endpoint for accelerated drug approval in MM. Nevertheless, there is limited evidence of MRD utility in real-world setting. In this retrospective multicenter study, we report outcomes of 331 newly diagnosed MM patients with MRD evaluation at Day+100 after autologous stem cell transplantation using flow cytometry with a median limit of detection of 0.001%. MRD negativity was reached in 47% of patients and was associated with significantly prolonged median PFS (49.2 months vs. 18.4 months; hazard ratios (HR) = 0.37; p < 0.001) and OS (not reached vs. 74.9 months; HR = 0.50; p = 0.007). Achieving MRD negativity was associated with PFS improvements regardless of age, International Staging System (ISS) stage, lactate dedydrogenase (LDH) level, or cytogenetic risk. Importantly, MRD positive patients benefited from lenalidomide maintenance versus no maintenance (18-months PFS: 81% vs. 46%; HR = 0.24; p = 0.002) while in MRD negative patients such benefit was not observed (p = 0.747). The outcomes of our real-world study recapitulate results from clinical trials including meta-analyses and support the idea that MRD positive patients profit more from lenalidomide maintenance than MRD negative ones.

Indexed as

Flow CytometryMultiple MyelomaNeoplasm, ResidualAdultAgedFemaleHematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationHumansLenalidomideMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingPrognosisRetrospective StudiesTransplantation, AutologousTreatment OutcomeLenalidomidelenalidomide maintenanceminimal residual disease (MRD)multiparameter flow cytometrymultiple myelomaoverall survival (OS)progression‐free survival (PFS)real‐world

Identifiers

PMID39390851
PMCPMC11613619

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.