Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39390817›Full record

ArticleEcological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America2024

Pathways for accidental biocontrol: The human-mediated dispersal of insect predators and parasitoids.

Gyda Fenn-Moltu, Andrew M Liebhold, Donald C Weber, Cleo Bertelsmeier

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Pathways for accidental biocontrol: The human-mediated dispersal of insect predators and parasitoids.Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Gyda Fenn-MoltuDepartment of Ecology and Evolution, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6148-8076
Andrew M LiebholdUSDA Forest Service Northern Research Station, Morgantown, West Virginia, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7427-6534
Donald C WeberUSDA Agricultural Research Service, Invasive Insect Biocontrol and Behavior Laboratory, Beltsville, Maryland, USA.
Cleo BertelsmeierDepartment of Ecology and Evolution, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3624-1300

Funding

Canton VaudOP RDE CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/16_019/000080OP RDE EVA4.0Swiss National Science Foundation 310030_192619The Fondation Sandoz-Monique de Meuron pour la relève universitaireUSDA Forest Service International Programs
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introductions of insect predators and parasitoids for biological control are a key method for pest management. Yet in recent decades, biological control has become more strictly regulated and less frequent. Conversely, the rate of unintentional insect introductions through human activities is rising. While accidental introductions of insect natural enemies can potentially have serious ecological consequences, they are challenging to quantify as their movements go largely unobserved. We used historical border interception records collected by the US Department of Agriculture from 1913 to 2018 to describe the diversity of entomophagous insects transported unintentionally, their main introduction pathways, and trends in host specificity. There were 35,312 interceptions of insect predators and parasitoids during this period, representing 93 families from 11 orders, and 196 species from these families. Commodity associations varied, but imported plants and plant products were the main introduction pathway. Most interceptions originated with commodities imported from the Neotropical, Panamaian, and Western Palearctic regions. Among the intercepted species, 27% were found in material originating from more than one country. Two thirds of species were polyphagous host generalists. Furthermore, 25% of species had already been introduced intentionally as biological control agents internationally, and 4.6% have documented negative impacts on native biodiversity or human society. Most of the intercepted species that have not established in the United States are host generalists or have at least one known host species available. The unintentional transport of diverse natural enemy insects has the potential to cause substantial ecological impacts, both in terms of controlling pests through accidental biocontrol and disrupting native communities. Characterizing the insects being transported and their introduction pathways can inform biosecurity practices and management.

Indexed as

InsectaPest Control, BiologicalAnimal DistributionAnimalsHumansIntroduced SpeciesPredatory BehaviorUnited Statesaccidental biocontrolborder interceptionshuman‐mediated dispersalinsectsintroduction pathwaysparasitoidspredators

Identifiers

PMID39390817
PMCPMC11610710

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.