ArticleThe journal of international advanced otology2024
An International Survey of the Diagnosis and Management of Ménière's Disease Amongst Otolaryngology Consultants.
Article in The journal of international advanced otology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ménière's Disease (MD) is a disease that may be difficult to diagnose and manage. Our UK survey showed variability in the practice of UK Otolaryngology consultants. We hence surveyed Otolaryngology consultants internationally, to assess their confidence levels in diagnosing MD, their use of the AAO-HNS guidelines and current diagnostic and treatment modalities. An online questionnaire was distributed internationally over four weeks. The questionnaire asked respondents to anonymously rank their confidence in diagnosing MD, identify the minimum investigations required to make a diagnosis, describe their use of the AAO-HNS criteria, share their preferred treatment modalities for acute attacks, and state their 1st and 2nd-line preventative treatment options. A total of 173 responses were collected with 77% of respondents reporting high levels of confidence in diagnosing MD. Most respondents stated the minimum tests required were "History, Otoscopy, Clinical Vestibular testing, and Pure Tone Audiometry" although some chose as few as 1 test. Regarding the use of the AAO-HNS criteria, responses ranged from "always" (20.2%) to "never" (22.5%). Cinnarizine was the first-line treatment for acute attacks followed by betahistine. Betahistine (30.1%) and dietary restrictions (28.3%) were recommended almost equally as first-line preventative measures. The most popular second-line measure was intratympanic steroids injection (30.1%). Our survey revealed disparities in the diagnosis of MD and its management, like the results of our previously conducted UK survey. This suggests the need for an international consensus regarding the diagnosis and subsequent management strategies for this disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.